MGS 4 Intro & First Mission

Metal Gear Solid 4 Intro & First Mission

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

• MGS4
• MGS
• metal
• gear
• solid
• intro
• and
• first
• mission
• gameplay
• love
• theme
• unboxing
• unpacking
• gra
• wideo

[nasos397]

i knew it was fake all i wanted to see it was if i am gonna rick rolled

[myke336]

why are you guys fighting about this. both systems own. i bougth both systems. yeah they almost have the exact same games cept for some exclusives. but the exclusives own. we are all gamers.

[diegopg100]

Vai se fude seu filho da puta ( i spoke in portuguese)

[darkmoon187ff]

true true. buh mass effects environments were big. and that game was released in 2007. and mass effect 2 is looking damn good too with environments. buh halo 3's graphics did suck ass.lol. luckily halo 3 odst didnt suffer as much n they actually put time into it.

[fpsd0minat0r]

so that means xbox is great but bungie are being bitches and releasing a crappy looking game???

i didnt think so......

and call of duty games dont have environments anywhere near the size of killzone or other games like resistance.

you could argue dead space looks great but face it.....it loads stuff when your in the elevator.

if games could load small environments in short periods of time then any game would be good.

[darkmoon187ff]

jus look at chrome engine 4 or cryengine 3 demo running on consoles. even tho modern warfare is third party, its running on both consoles and that is looking jus as clean if not really close to killzone. cryengine 3's demo for xbox 360 is cutting edge graphics and is the best looking for the consoles. to me, crysis has too many bugs and could be better gameplay wise, buh there is not one game u can say that looks better than it. and the cryengine 3 running on 360 looks just as good as crysis.

[fpsd0minat0r]

u say xbox can handle killzone.

but why then an average looking game like halo 3 cant even do 720p native???

if xbox can handle killzone 2 then surely it must be able to do halo 3 at 1080p native.

i have to see something good on xbox to believe it.

[darkmoon187ff]

lol. well i went to a comic-con and crytek was showing off their new engine making it possible to run crysis tech on the consoles. they said the cryengine 3 is pushing the graphics almost to the limits of both the ps3 and 360. meaning in one comment that was said, "360 cant handle killzone 2 graphics" has been proven verry wrong. cryengine 3 demo is running technology killzone 2 cant stack up to. and even modern warfare 2 is challenging killzone 2 in every aspect of the game. graphics, gameplay

[fpsd0minat0r]

what other reasons would there be for not bringing out a new console???

if u dont want to make reasons for criticism or improve on what i have to say then then stop being a moron by writing pointless comments.

[fpsd0minat0r]

lmfao fixed cost will increase.....and they havent even made a significant return from the existing PS3.

they cant just keep spending money until they do make a return, they have to make the most of what they got before they start a new project.

and secondly if they ditch all the PS3 customers then no-one will buy the PS4. Sony has a 10 year life long policy and they treat the customers fairly.

with ur attitude, you should work for shitty microsoft, they change consoles every 5 years.

[kegs666]

I was referring to your stupid comment about fixed costs and your little introductory project management unit...(if you are discussing basic cost curves, its as introductory as they come..).

If you think "fixed costs" are what determine a project's potential, you definitely failed.

Sure, what that guy said is probably bullshit, but not for the stupid reasons you cited.

It's always amusing when someone attempts to establish credibility and then dismally fails.

[fpsd0minat0r]

more like urs is bad......no reasoning what so ever.

but i suppose you know what ever you say i will prove wrong and will strengthen the PS3 in the same aspect.

you can give it a try and fail if u want anyway....