Top Ten Tanks- #2: M1 Abrams

With its use of technology the M1 Abrams tops the list as one the best battle tanks fighting today.

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

• M1
• Abrams
• Tank
• top
• fighting
• battle
• tank
• Military
• Channel

[pnelad14]

@gameragodzilla /watch?v=GLBIRfHvcMs just watch that...Enough said...

[pnelad14]

@gameragodzilla From TND "The engine is electronically governed to 3200 RPM and that in 6th gear is it capable of 70km/h (road speed and cross-country) thanks to its Hydropneumatic suspension AKA Hydrogas." Take that!

[pnelad14]

@gameragodzilla Abrams armour is weak there hence the TUSK upgrade. But ERA won't stop a KE round. THE CR2 HAS DORCHESTER 2nd gen Chobham...It's quite logical to assume it's better...But hey you seem to lack logic...Oh I'm the fanboy? Yes...Ignore facts...Don't provide any of your own. You don't know anything about the CR2 really because I've supplied you so much info you're just speculating..Do some research and then I'll take you seriously...

[pnelad14]

@gameragodzilla WHAT? You don't even know what the CR2 fire control system is like..."This main battle tank has a digital fire control system, that has been developed in Canada and is one of the most accurate fire control systems fitted on the combat vehicle. The Challenger 2 is also a fine example of some of the best gadgets and systems that can be found in a MBT." So shut up! Both armour is good but the CR2 has better! The CR2 would go for your side armour because....

[pnelad14]

@gameragodzilla penetrators too! So...Be quiet about HESH and do research...

[pnelad14]

@gameragodzilla No that's were I can tell you know nothing. The L30 gun is more powerful than the Abrams.Meaning it can have rifle yet at leat be on par with THE ABRAMS. My God...I've repeated that so much. Mobility is much better? CR2: 40 km/h. Abram M1A2: 48.28 km/h that is 5 MPH more! Yeah! Much better! I only used BTD once...You make it sound like I constantly use him...Even then I get the impression he knows more about tanks than you. Just so you're aware the CR2 uses KE

[pnelad14]

@gameragodzilla If the Abram is moving towards them it won'tbe difficult compared to a circling. You haven't REALLY DISCUSSED range...I don't know what your point is. Here is a fact for you to understand. CR2 has better range meaning it can fire at the Abram yet the Abram can not return fire effectively. The CR2 would use THAT to it's advantage. Got that?

[pnelad14]

@gameragodzilla OK discard all evidence...So far you've discarded Wiki which states it sources. You've discarded TND. You've discarded BTD.LOL yet you've brung no evidence...Poor show mate! I never said it can't take a single RPG...Of course it can...at the front. But the sides...Why the tusk? You're just being stubborn. Plus you bring no valid evidence to saying why BTD is a bad source...LOL. You're point about fire control system has so many variable I label you as a joke!

[pnelad14]

@gameragodzilla Of course it is...BUT your fail to see that the CR2 has a higher PROBABILITY which puts the maths IN THE CR2'S FAVOUR!! Next! You discard ALL evidence you're given...Yet you have no evidence to support yourself, OK. "I just happen to rate 2nd gen Chobham as similar in strength. NOT superior, however." You just? That's hreat that just shows you that your arguemnt is poor. Guess what mate...Dorchester is better than Chobham...That's a fact. DEAL with it.

[pnelad14]

@MyJimmyMonster Well...Look it up...I can't help it if your arrogance blinds you.