Fascist Check Point in Missoula, Montana

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
771 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 12, 2010

http://www.battleforjustice.com/

usually people come to Montana to avoid this sort of thing, you know?

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (fatkidinabucket)

  • hey slim, i guess you wouldn't know that blocking a citizens path on the road and asking them for their papers violates their right to be safe and secure in their effects... 4th amendment...

    A vehicle IS an "effect"

  • Unfortunately, in a few cases our scam supreme court has ruled these constitutional. Where they truly become illegal is when they use dogs. The police will claim this checkpoint is not "unreasonable" per the 4th amendment but I disagree with that... I think it is unreasonable to stop everyone just looking for phantoms.

    They STILL have to get a warrant signed by a judge under oath to search it.

  • @RP4409, I'd say the state supreme court can decide for itself but it is a crock that the supreme court in DC ruled for checkpoints. they obviously impede our right to travel freely

see all

All Comments (20)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @rlslim494 Dude! It isn't Greek!

    "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

    Where's the probable cause, where's the oath and warrant, where's the specific place, person, and thing?

  • @rlslim494 Again, that is irrelevant. Read the 4th Amendment.

  • @rlslim494 They don't have to remove the occupants, nor do they have to enter or search the glove box. Again, read my first comment. Now read what you wrote in response. Now read the 4th Amendment. Seriously, read it. Now, could you please explain to me how this is not in direct violation of the 4th Amendment of the Constitution which IS the highest law of the land?

  • @rlslim494 But they are conducting a search of your vehicle and person in these checkpoints without any warrant being signed by a judge. Do you agree or disagree that this is in direct violation with the 4th amendment? It doesn't matter if you like the action or not - the Constitution was made to be obeyed even if you disagree with it.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more