Tony Szamboti, M.E. - Mechanical Engineer

Mr. Szamboti provides a comprehensive analysis of the undeniable discrepancies between the NIST report, their modeling and their findings compared to what factual-based evidence exists.

This is raw footage from one of the experts appearing in our upcoming, hard-hitting documentary of evidence for the destruction of the 3 World trade Center skyscrapers -- "9/11: Explosive Evidence -- Experts Speak Out"

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• tony szamboti
• mechanical
• ae911truth
• 9/11
• architect
• engineer
• high-rise
• demolition
• incendiaries
• explosive
• wtc
• wtc7
• Architects
• Engineers
• world trade center
• new york
• terror attacks
• FEMA
• NIST
• controlled
• thermate
• nanotechnology
• destruction
• September 11
• CDI
• Experts Speak Out
• Richard Gage
• tower
• building
• elevator

[WTFaboutWTC7]

All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.

GOOD MEN ARE DOING SOMETHING.

Thank you mr. Szamboti

[wivi61]

what we see in the model is a natural collapse,

what we see on the videos is not a natural collapse!

tony szambodi for president! this man is great!

[demerc]

Guys, I am not naive.I know what sociopaths are capable of, but for this to have been planned by the Gov,with controlled demolition,is a level of evil and organization so incredibly monumental,i think to rely on it deters people from the ultimate truth which is that the level of evil of our current lifestyle is so insidious and seemingly innocuous and convoluted, that it involves every single one of us.It's a lot harder and unromantic pill to swallow, than something of this magnitude.

[madderthanalex]

Now I see that the correct exposure of information regarding the collapse of 3 buildings.Thus it follows that when the evidence becomes clearly overwhelming

& on the verge of becoming known to billions of people world wide,that the next

event on the near horizon must be a similar 911 event, but at least 10x in magnitude so as to massively DISTRACT from the uncovering of the TRUTH of the

1st EVENT - " 911 ". My guess is a " Lone Wolf style attack ", using a Dirty Nuclear Bomb. Maybe Chicago!

[ThoughtCrime7]

inside job

[sananda2012]

Mr. Szamboti seemed annoyingly aloof in the first five minutes, by the ten minute mark he'd presented enough inconsistencies about the NIST report to begin comprehending why and 20 minutes in I felt sorely that this intelligent man had to waste his time examining what a 7th grader would probably have done better. The NIST report is an insult to American academia and a twisting barbed dagger in the heart of the survivors who have sought truth from day one. Many thanks, Mr. Tony Szamboti!

[Funkadelic2]

Folks, it IS important that you show your sympathy with those seeking a new investigation, but it is important too, to really sign the petitions actually demanding a new, real, IMPARTIAL investigation:

w w w 2.ae911truth. org/signpetition. p h p

Thank you.

[GruesomeTruth]

@EGRJ

I never stated 'all of 7'.

You say WTC7 was 'ablaze'? -if 7 was 'ablaze' then what do you call it when a skyscraper has more than a few floors with fires? If a building is 'ablaze' it means most or all of the building is clearly on fire--Not the case with 7.

Why waste your precious time here?

The official conspiracy story certainly doesn't need help.. unless you're worried that it does?

Is it not enough major media support the official version?

Sure you have better things to do.

[EGRJ]

@GruesomeTruth By the way, was the Towers' collapse aimed towards 7 so They'd have debris hit it to give Them an excuse for the collapse?

[EGRJ]

@GruesomeTruth You've changed your claim from "all of 7" to "the bulk of 7".

Fiterman Hall was effectively destroyed by the damage. Tthere was a hole in the building from the roof to the ground.

The only building in the direction of WTC 1/2 was WTC 6, which was destroyed by the same collapse that set 7 ablaze. FH and the VB are to the North and West of 7, respectively. In other words, AWAY from WTC 1, 2, and 6.

bit ly/11vMJ4

[GruesomeTruth]

@EGRJ

The vast bulk of WTC7 did indeed collapse straight down, doing shockingly Little damage to nearby buildings.

You can clearly see from multiple videos that WTC7 fell straight down for approx 3/4 of its collapse, and only in the final second or two did it finally start to tilt in the direction of WTC1 & 2--thus towards buildings Already heavily damaged by debris from each of the Twin Towers.

[GruesomeTruth]

Mr. Szamboti calmly nailed numerous points, calling into serious question the pathetic investigation done by NIST.

Excellent research and solid presentation of multiple reasons why a new & independent investigation must be performed--one with Subpoena Power.