video response to burnvictim77

Video response to burnvictim77

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• 911
• video
• response

[marshallbs]

You're comparing a 50 story building to a 9 story building. 7 collapsed while 6 didn't because it was a lot heavier! Its support columns bore a lot more weight and thus it was more likely to collapse from structural failure.

Use a little logic and intuition and it discredits all your conspiracy theories.

[Esseyex]

I'm not comparing building 5 and 6 to building 7 for a collapse. I am comparing the damage done in the radius of collapsed buildings. Bankers Trust was a lot closer to a collapsed building and is of comparable size and structure and it did not collapse. Yet it sustained greater or equal damage as WTC 7. Watch the video again please it is very logical and there is no theory relating to a conspiracy its all based on science.

[Spectre11B]

Also, every point you brought up can be explained logically without the need to infer conclusion(which is illogical).

WTC7 was the hardest hit building in the area from debris. Every building had firefighters that worked to extinguish the fires, but WTC7 reached a critical point where the leadership decided to pull the firefighters from the building and let it burn down.

Those firefighers then were moved to the other buildings. You just assumed they all were abandoned to let burn.

[Esseyex]

Would you be so kind to explain them then? I have a lot of questions. If you have time, thanks. How was it the hardest building hit in the area? Buildings 5 and 6 looked like they were hit a lot harder. Buiding 7 didnt burn down. It fell in about 8 or 9 seconds, straight down. Click on my name and watch my video about a controlled demolitionist. Thanks and thank you for the intelligent conversation. Peace.

[shadow1allaround]

I find it funny that idiots like marshllbs go onto videos like this and calls it "conspiracy theory" when all you show him is facts - people like that don't want to know the truth and wouldn't get it if it came up and slapped him in the face - like this does!

[djjimi]

Interesting. Could have also been modified to make it easier to destroy durring a false flag attack too.

[catrapesdog99]

THANX 4 DOING THE VIDEO INSIDE JOB

[Spectre11B]

Excellent then, I await this proof beyond a doubt in a court of law. Should be an open and closed case, as far as you are concerned.

[snipboy]

Building 7 was structurally reinforced in 1989 giving it, "Enough redundancy to allow entire portions of floors to be removed without affecting the building's structural integrity," according to the New York Times.

[snipboy]

True there are conspiracy theorist who draw quick conclusions, but I can show you hundreds of videos essays etc. in which highly distinguished researchers proficiently assemble facts that prove beyond a doubt that mere fires and the damage incurred from WTC1's debris did not cause the symmetrical collapse.

[youmightknowless]

Wow, Spectre. Were my words really so difficult to understand? Let me try a different approach. Stay with me, now.

1) A sound hypothesis must deal with all observed data.

2) You ignore the eutectic/iron-rich spherules evidence.

3) Your hypothesis needs revision in order to take this evidence into account.

journalof911studies

[Spectre11B]

Most people struggle with basic algebra which only deals with finite variables but you sir, with your supreme intellect are able to compute the trillions of variables that go into everyday life. I applaude you.

I suggest you start your own society, and let us average people continue to produce cars, phones, television,computers and YOUTUBE that you seem to enjoy so much. Good Day!