My philosophy project for the third term. Ethics + aesthetics.
If the aged film effect annoys you, watch the other version. XD.
But said effect backs some of the conclusions that can be drawn from the video, that wouldn't be as clear, though present, in the other.
But basically I think the animation just looks better with the old fashion style.
There is no sound for most of the animation; which means that it is meant to be watched that way: turn off the radio or music, but don't mute the computer. XD
There are meanings for everything (okay, okay, nearly everything) in the video, including the lack of colour, style of drawing and scarcity of sound. Some of these meanings it is more than likely that I haven't even seen yet. I believe though the author may or must have an idea in mind, it isn't till the author becomes a spectator that the true meaning or alternative meanings are made clear. Or unclear.
If anyone watches the video, or reads this essay of an intro, please leave a comment saying what meaning/s you find in it.
Anyway, as usual I'm yapping on about God-knows-what and confusing myself.
Enjoy! Infact, think! Infact, ENJOY THINKING!
I do XD
Thanks! I got a 9 (out of 10) for this =)
XaaliOReilly 3 years ago
That was really beautiful animation. I'd like to hear the director's commentary. Was it post-deconstructionist, or neo-pavlovian? (just kidding, i don't know what to make of it...but it was great!) Hope your prof likes it.
davestonedesign 3 years ago 2
Hehe thanks Ruben.
Watch out with your spelling. XD
XaaliOReilly 3 years ago
I liked it very much.
It might be wan of my favorit anemacions
AssortmentOfWeirdos 3 years ago