The top atheistic fallacy that plagues Youtube - ozmoroid responds

My response to "The top atheistic fallacy that plagues Youtube," by philos71. Original vid at

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iXFurmM49WI

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• theism
• atheism
• Christianity
• creationism

[fertilizerspike]

@jshowa10

The evidence is abundant and in the public domain. You have a lot of catching up to do before you can add anything but noise to this discussion.

[fertilizerspike]

@jshowa10

I can see your faith is unshaken, and that you have no intention of doing any more research. Until you do, you're condemning without investigation. When you continually deny something you don't even understand you look more and more like a fool. You have a lot of catching up to do before you can add anything but noise to this discussion.

[fertilizerspike]

@jshowa10

You have a lot of catching up to do, and so do most of the teachers you've known, if you're to be believed. The evidence is abundant and in the public domain. I suggest you start your research now, you're not getting any younger.

[fertilizerspike]

@jshowa10

The evidence is abundant and in the public domain. You have a lot of catching up to do before you can add anything but noise to this discussion. I suggest you start your research right away, you aren't getting any younger.

[fertilizerspike]

@jshowa10

I see you have no intention of actually doing any research to educate yourself.

[jshowa10]

@fertilizerspike And, in fact, I wouldn't be asking you for evidence if I wasn't trying to investigate your claims. All I'm asking you is to provide me evidence for your electromagnetic force explanation for orbiting planets. According to you, it should be easy. If you don't provide any evidence, why should I believe you? Why should anyone accept that explanation as valid? As you said yourself, science requires evidence, so provide some!

[jshowa10]

@fertilizerspike Oh and faith is belief without evidence, which you seem to be content with regarding your "plasma electromagnetic force" theory.

[jshowa10]

@fertilizerspike Like I said, I've done the research, I went to school for engineering, I've taken multiple science course, two physics courses (one on electromagnetics) taught at by university physicists and not one of them said that the only force is electromagnetic force. Now I'm willing to concede all this to you, if you can provide evidence from that abundant public domain knowledge, that planets orbit based on electromagnetic forces.

[jshowa10]

@fertilizerspike There is ZERO mention of plasma, and ZERO mention of electromagnetic forces. That's why I'm asking someone like you to provide evidence. Telling someone to figure it out for one self, is not how you teach people effectively. In fact, its one of the worst ways of teaching and as you are implying, waists peoples time, especially when someone is making a claim about the world and won't provide any evidence for it.

[jshowa10]

@fertilizerspike Well, whats clear to me is that you're unwilling to provide any evidence to support your claim. However, with a simple look into the public domain, as you've told me to do, searching "what makes planets orbit", every single link says its caused by the pull of gravity on another object in space or as the result of curved space time.