Uploaded by RAIDERJO76 on Dec 19, 2008
Part 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4SqH6WT9hhk
Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h-wBR6eJoPI
Part 3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0JeZsxIfEOI
Part 4: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zVKX-aZxW6A
Part 5: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUHyXgo105c
Part 6: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=REmJLB3GeZQ
"The Shack" by William P. Young, or Paul Young, is currently without a doubt the most popular book within Christian circles. In fact, its popularity is so widespread that is currently the seventh bestselling book on Amazon.com.
But should Christians be reading this book? Many other Christians, such as Matt Slick, have accused "The Shack" of teaching heresy regarding God's nature, especially the Trinity.
Matt Slick of CARM (Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry) interviews William Young, the author, in this clip and exposes some of the errors in the book. This clip is from Matt Slick's radio show, "Faith and Reason" and is from carm.org.
-
19 likes, 15 dislikes
Link to this comment:
Uploader Comments (RAIDERJO76)
Top Comments
-
Matt does a great job with debates. This proves what others have been saying about The Shack: It promotes a universalist god; one who can and will be anything to anybody, as long as it's what they want him to be.
TheotherPrometheus 3 years ago 6
-
YES! I heard this live it's awsome, I really hope alot of ppl find this video and relize the truth
Calvinist4Christ 3 years ago 2
All Comments (37)
-
Matt slick is having difficulty with the "frame within a frame device" that author's use. The epilogue and the prologue can all be a part of this frame.
He is also not familiar with the creation of a persona. Many created personalities do maintain that the events actually happened, for example Robinson Crusoe but in no way is it ever understood that Robinson Crusoe actually lived. Matt could stand to take a good literature course. I do not speak here of theology which may be questioned.
meggy8868 2 years ago
-
Matt slick is having difficulty with the "frame within a frame device" that author's use. The epilogue and the prologue can all be a part of this frame.
He is also not familiar with the creation of a persona. Many created personalities do maintain that the events actually happened, for example Robinson Crusoe but in no way is it ever understood that Robinson Crusoe actually lived. Matt could stand to take a good literature course. I do not speak here of theology which may be questioned.
meggy8868 2 years ago
-
The afterward is part of the "frame within a frame" structure that often fiction writers use. Matt is also having trouble with the creation of a persona.
Now, this is not a commentary on the theology however, but Matt is definitely not familiar with writing devices.
meggy8868 2 years ago
-
Well if you are admitting that this moral standard is completely relative, then why are you telling me that my God is immoral? Are you're REALLY telling me is that you don't LIKE my God, are you not?
RAIDERJO76 2 years ago
-
Actually, the average Muslim really doesn't know why they believe what they believe. That's why muslim teachers tell them not to debate christians. They are clueless and follow islam because their parents did.
nathaw11 2 years ago
-
The relative moral standard created by my brain as a result of social evolution, and personal experience.
Havenfall 2 years ago
28:22Dr. Sungenis humiliates Matt Slickby Theologica376,336 views
2:41The Shack - The Movie...by 1mindone27,399 views
9:49Matt Slick Interviews William P. Young on "The ...by RAIDERJO764,730 views
8:33William P Young - Interview with author of The ...by Hope10324,870 views
4:33The Shack - A Subtle Attack on Christianity or...by TBCWLA5,776 views
2:13La Cabaña Paul Young/ Frasesby luisaitza3,437 views
9:43Matt Slick Interviews William P. Young on "The ...by RAIDERJO763,653 views
9:53Matt Slick Interviews William P. Young on "The ...by RAIDERJO763,869 views
9:57Matt Slick Interviews William P. Young on "The ...by RAIDERJO763,448 views
7:24A CABANA - Testemunho de William P. Youngby jumamoura31,145 views
6:35Matt Slick Won??? PART 2/2 - AE #594by kyokumajr8,807 views
4:53Conversation with the author of "The Shack"by carmvideos4,078 views
10:57Apologist Caller: Matt Slick & Transcendental A...by kyokumajr8,812 views
9:51Abortion by Matt Slickby testskriftene28,506 views
9:08William P. Young author of The Shack on Atlanta...by AtlantaRoddy19,955 views
8:26Matt Slick Interviews William P. Young (Part 6)by RAIDERJO762,438 views
0:14Oprah - The Shackby bobbydownes56,005 views
9:41Matt Slick - Were Adam & Eve real people? - Par...by MetanoiaCatalyst1,979 views
9:47William P. Young author of The Shack on Atlanta...by AtlantaRoddy50,260 views
8:22MATT SLICK vs DAN BARKER 1by vekl13,598 views
- Loading more suggestions...
Matt Slick is losing more people to the Darkness than he will ever win to the Light.
Please quit while you're behind Matt. Stop being Judge and Jury and let God's Light shine.
kennyg99 2 years ago
Kenny, is there something wrong with standing behind the teachings of Scripture?
RAIDERJO76 2 years ago
Using Scripture to debate a Fictional Story only makes Matt look silly. Critisizing Wm Young for using an African American Women to represent God also tells me he probably didn't read the book since later an Old White Man was used . Either way , for Matt to quote Scripture to say God can't be seen, what about the story in Gen 32 when Jacob wrestled with God ? In Gen 32:31 it says,"So Jacob called the name of the place Peniel---"For I have seen the Divine face to face, yet my life was spared.
kennyg99 2 years ago
Kenny, Jacob saw the pre-incarnate Christ, not the Father or Jesus' divine nature. But anyways, the point is, why do you accuse Matt of being judgmental when he is simply standing for what Scripture teaches? Is there something wrong with that?
RAIDERJO76 2 years ago