Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

The James Web Space Telescope Comedy

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
504 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 12, 2012

NASA's flagship cosmology mission, the James Web Space Telescope, continues to be funded despite gross mismanagement and *insane* cost overruns. In this video we laugh so as to avoid crying.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (4)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • 2018???

    Why cant we just invent space manufacturing instead.

    For that we need: 1) Genuine Artificial Intelligence 2) Good reliable fast engines.

    We can send intelligent robots to dig metal from meteors bring them closer to the sun and then transform them into space machines and habitats and factories. The only thing we need to provide from earth are organic materials like wood, plastic, rubber, etc. All the steel and gold needed could come from asteroids.

  • Continued from previous post again:

    given period of time...

    Of course politicians rarely think beyond timeframes that are longer than the time to the next election and so they often decide to delay an issue. All good as long as they can claim to have reduced cost (for their term anyway). Lets let the next guy deal with the exploding cost that I have just caused.

    Again, I think that much of this could be avoided by doing things right from the start as described in the first point I posted earlier

  • Continuing my last post:

    "standing army" syndrome... Thats right a standing army of engineers, whether they sit arround and wait for funding to continue the actual work, or do actually work on something, keeps costing you money. So every month that you delay a project because you want to stretch out the cost over a longer timeframe will actually add to the total cost of the project even if the running costs might be a bit lower for a given period of time...

  • There are two issues at work here:

    1. NASAs method of acquisition. Cost plus contracts without milestones and without much control cause initial cost estimates to be purposely way below the actual expected cost. It can always be adjusted upwards once the project is approved and contracts have been given out.

    This could be avoided by using fixed cost contracts with milestones instead.

    2. Lack of adequate funding and new requirements cause delays, which cost money due to "standing army" syndrome.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more