Nano-thermite took down the WTC?
Loading...
Loading...
7:42Mythbusters - Thermite vs Iceby integrajoey731,642 views
Featured Video- 2:58Russia slams 'unacceptable' draft resolution on...by RussiaToday2,178 views
- 1:38Before SOPA they tried to kill VCR!by RussiaToday11,411 views
- 3:10'Free Syrian Army' claims Damascus suburb after...by RussiaToday10,351 views
- 1:30RT caught in Syria protest: Rebel fighters take...by RussiaToday3,399 views
- 10:05This 10 Minute Video Will Change Your Lifeby Cincinnati911Truth126,509 views
- 6:029/11 Incontrovertible Proof the Government is L...by NanoThermite911347,150 views
- 4:20Thermite Scientifically Confirmed in 911by UnslaveMee70,240 views
- 10:43Why the End of America is Closer than You Thinkby OneWithTheTruth91,380 views
- 2:32Mr President the Whole World knows 9/11 was a Lieby Steeper3347,127 views
- 8:08Jon Stewart Changes Fox News 9/11 Responders Bi...by TheYoungTurks249,909 views
- 1:519/11 Firefighters Reveal Bombs Destroyed WTC lobbyby clbackus28,352 views
- 8:12THERMITE USED ON 9/11! Absolute Proof Explosive...by 911TruthVideos16,077 views
- 5:16General of all American Intelligence: 911 was a...by sugarpuddin88299,313 views
- 9:009/11 Truth: What Happened to Building 7by clbackus1,764,070 views
- 1:234409 -- (Unseen Footage) Tower 7 blasted into r...by RP440913,170,362 views
- 2:48Molten Metal WTC Thermite 911 Demolitionby 911Demolition74,920 views
- 3:00A Kind Of Thermite (2parts plaster-1pt Al)by desinfector168,562 views
- 1:03Thermiteby nuclearrabbit132,295 views
- 3:52Thermite vs. Carby Baltaszar490,881 views
@Sandberg1972
What is there to prove? Watch the WTC7 video. Obviously a negligible amount of structural strength was present. That's evidence right there. Unless you're a looney conspiracy theorists. People who don't wear tin foil hats tend to not believe everything Alex Jones says.
eatwoodman 1 day ago
@eatwoodman OK, so all you & NIST have got to do now is prove that "a negligible amount of structure would have to be present", across the entire floorarea of the first 8 floors. Notice the word "negligible" here.
Good luck with that mate! LOL!
Sandberg1972 2 days ago
@Sandberg1972
For the WTC7 to fall at free fall, a negligible amount of structure would have to be present. This does not contradict any physics. If it fell faster than free fall, it would have. Contradicting physics is saying CD knocked the building down when it collapsed to silently. Yeah, silent bombs don't exist.
eatwoodman 2 days ago
@eatwoodman Degree in economics, like that would matter.
Look buddy, it's obvious u don't have any answers to the issues I brling up. U've had plenty of chances to make ur case, instead u've resorted to the same avoiding tactics every time.
But it is highschool physics that's at stake here. Seems the official story has some problems when it comes to Newtonian physics. Wouldn't u think so? But hey, u're not even aware of these problems, are u?
I pity folks like u, the avoiding kind. .
Sandberg1972 1 week ago
The Harrit paper that allegedly shows active thermite to be in the red part of the chips fails to take into consideration the lack of aluminum in the red chips as shown in the figure 15 c XEDS map of the red/grey chip shown in figures 12 and 13. No Aluminum, no aluminothermitic reaction. Sorry Niels, you been owned by your own paper.
lijebaley01 1 week ago
@Sandberg1972
What's your highest level of education, high school? LOL. I love it when kids talk like they're more intelligent than scholars.
eatwoodman 1 week ago