Uploaded by WhiteJarrah on Dec 25, 2010
A lot has happened since the release of my 23-part "MoonFaker: Radioactive Anomaly" series. A few months ago I asked the propagandists 32 questions regarding Apollo. It looks as though Astrobrant2 has dodged his way through them.
More recently, Phil Webb has produced a two part response to a brief passing mention in "Exhibit D" about how the Soviets warned Sir Bernard Lovell that they "could see no way of protecting cosmonauts from the lethal effects of solar radiation".
In summery: Webb claims that the Soviets never went to the moon, not because of deadly radiation, but because they couldn't get the N-1 moon rocket to work. But by focusing only on the failed N-1, he ignores the Zond & Energia programs. Both of which were proven technology, the former of which was considered flight worthy and could have flown two cosmonauts around the moon as early as December 1968. If you build it, and test it, why not use it? The Soviets obviously had bigger programs to worry about than the N-1, like say, radiation.
Meanwhile, a certain Wikipedia vandal has tried to muddy the waters as to whether or not there were any major solar flares during the Apollo missions and as to whether or not the minor ones can hurt you. He has also demanded specific calculations for the attenuation of the Van Allen belt electrons.
As my Christmas present to all within the Apollo moon landing hoax movement, I present to you my follow-up to "MoonFaker: Radioactive Anomaly".
In Parts 1-2 and 4, we will be going through the radiation-related questions that Astrobrant2 answered. Or more accurately dodged.
In Part 3 will will be debunking the Wikipedia Vandals's misconceptions of solar flares, the Van Allen belts, and the shielding offered by the CSM.
In Part 4-7, we will see that, contrary to what Webb claims, the Soviets indeed knew the cislunar radiation would kill their cosmonuts. They had bigger things to worry about than whether or not the N-1 could work. Other tangents Webb goes on include why didn't the Soviets fake their own moon project and the wheat deals.
Finally in Parts 8-9, I will be making some revisions, corrections and further clarifications to some statements I made in my first radiation series. These regard the South Atlantic Anomaly and camera film.
MoonFaker: What Proof Is Required?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2GLKLb0DNyY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pekpmUbwyv4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EK67QOwXQpU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iI0wwVzNwxc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I8k1ot_OAk0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M5ius21NwzI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZVN2VCsrcik
MoonFaker: Why Not Go Back?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n_Ka14URW5w
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w3Joz6vnpsg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c_X6W5WH_Dk
Category:
Tags:
- moonfaker
- radioactive
- anomaly
- II
- james
- van
- allen
- radiation
- belts
- bremsstrahlung
- calculations
- f=kZE
- 7-8g/cm^2
- Astronautical
- engineering
- and
- science
- 32
- questions
- for
- propagandists
- solar
- flare
- cosmic
- ray
- proton
- electron
- volts
- protons
- electrons
- x-ray
- x-rays
- MeV
- astronauts
- moon
- hoax
- conspiracy
- theory
- fake
- Soviet
- Union
- USSR
- Sir
- Bernard
- Lovell
- John
- Mauldin
- M.V.
- Keldysh
- E.E.
- Kovalev
- Jarrah
- White
- JW
- Studios
License:
Standard YouTube License
-
26 likes, 5 dislikes
15:05
Moonfaker: Radioactive Anomaly II. PART 3by WhiteJarrah1,108 views
10:47
The Moonstone of The Netherlands - Part 1by philwebb592,089 views
10:45
MoonFaker: Radioactive Anomaly. PART 3.by WhiteJarrah3,497 views
10:29
MoonFaker: Radioactive Anomaly. PART 7by WhiteJarrah2,998 views
10:53
MoonFaker: Radioactive Anomaly. PART 14by WhiteJarrah2,147 views
10:00
MoonFaker: Radioactive Anomaly. PART 10by WhiteJarrah2,463 views
4:53
Serious Questions About Apolloby un4g1v3n11,496 views
2:11
Osama Bin Laden Death Date on US Dollar Bill!!!by soccerkevin11549,681 views
15:13
MoonFaker: Moon Rocks Revisited. Episode 4, Wernher von Braun in Antarctica. PART 2by WhiteJarrah340 views
3:00
Buzz Aldrin Punches Bart Sibrel In The Face For Calling Him A Liar About The Moon Landingby IranContraScumDid9112,677 views
2:38
Apollo 11 Positionby nataylor374 views
0:52
saturdaynightfever intro pickup 01by gijsvandinther235,097 views
9:22
The truth behind the moon landings part 4by ClactonRadio12,170 views
3:06
SDO/EVE maps the Van Allen Beltsby SDOEVE10,235 views
10:31
Moon hoax - RADIATION IN OUTER SPACE (biggest proof man never went to moonby carolcamboriu3,249 views
2:21
Marcel - Astronautical Engineering Undergrad Studentby CapitolCollegeLaurel1,009 views
9:54
Logitech webcam C910 HD EFFECTS Testby CoxDzul67,386 views
2:14
Van Allen Belt.wmvby androdynamics776 views
15:00
Alerts - NASA - HAARP - Magnetospheric Breach - Electromagnetic Anomaly - New Madrid - FEMAby haarpWillNOTbeSilent6,659 views
0:15
SAA - South Atlantic Anomalyby Ay4shi11,543 views
- Loading more suggestions...
At 15:18 "Do minor solar flares give off >25 rem/hr..."
I went to the Comprehensive Flare Index to look if the flares mentioned in the Keller, Shelton, Burrell & Downey flare doses graph can be found there. And sure enough, there were flares equalling to the DATES of EACH of them flares
So, I don't think it can be said the weakest "LOW ENERGY" flare mentioned by K,S, B&D is a minor flare. Pretty likely these are all major flares.
(continues...)
Aurinkohirvi 11 months ago
Satellites in the lower belt receive about 2,500rems a year.
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
"offered no explanation for why his readings told him the radiations were deadly"
He did. He explicitly stated that "a person in the cabin of the space shuttle in a circular equatorial orbit in the most intense region of the inner belt at an altitude of 1000 miles would be subjected to a fatal dosage of radiation in about one week."
As has been explained to HBs many times, the Apollo craft avoided those regions, skirting the outer belts in less than an hour. Do you disagree with that?
HeadLikeARock 1 year ago
It is so obvious that James Van Allen was confronted by the criminals and forced to rescind his original findings or else he or his family would be harmed!
Such is the method that these criminals use to keep the truth silenced....
northerntruthseeker 1 year ago
Keep going JW, the truth is with you.
uwantsun 1 year ago
At 4:34, Kovalev showing these REM doses, would these be in a some sort of space craft, or a human being floating nude in the space?
If these doses are for astronauts within some sort of a space craft, then the conclusion must be: either these scientists are wrong, or Apollo crats were not manned.
If these doses are for a completely unshielded human being, then one could not apply these doses directly. The doses could be lower, or higher (the secondary radiation from aluminium shielding).
Aurinkohirvi 1 year ago
No virtually, as in Virtual Reality Jarrah! Wow, sneaky, slippery statement there Webster! Hey, trivial wording is his forte Jarrah!! LMAO...OWNED HIIM JARRAH!
Only one criticism Jarrah..I have to keep going back to your channel to find the additional parts. I don't mind though as it only increases channel views to your excellent YT ACCOUNT!
un4g1v3n1 1 year ago
Or maybe an even more appropriate metaphor for you Phil. Next time, don' t bring a knife to a gunfight!!!
un4g1v3n1 1 year ago
Webb should try reading them, instead of suggesting you sell them. Then he could avoid the humility attached to looking like an idiot. Notice I said looking like an idiot Webb. We both know you are smart as a whip, at least when it comes to perpetually offering continual propaganda techniques to defend your baseless position.Let me explain something to you Phil, that even you should understand...Next time you want to get into a battle of wits with Jarrah, try to make sure you have some on you!
un4g1v3n1 1 year ago