Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

The 3D Conspiracy

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
2,493
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 13, 2010

Don't be fooled, people! 3D is only "the future of film" because people want to cash in on its success. I don't think the effects are worth the price hike, and I think people should know that the 3D movement isn't so innocent.

Please Rate/Comment/Subscribe! I know this is not the sort of thing I usually do, but I worked hard on this video, so I hope you enjoy!

Blog Post:
http://blog.theboxofficejunkie.com/2010/01/3d-conspiracy-few-more-reasons-i-h...

Twitter:
http://twitter.com/BoxOfficeJunkie

Website:
http://theboxofficejunkie.com

Thanks for watching!
-Grady

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (goGradygo)

  • 4:48

    For what it's worth, Ebert is actually a big critic of 3D.

    I really don't like 3D. Depth is out of wack and everything's dimmer. It really is nothing but a gimmick, and while I know I'm in the minority, I liked Avatar more in 2D. I couldn't see what was so revolutionary about Cameron's technology.

    Hope it's just a fad that goes away like it was in the 50's.

  • @deltajuliet Haha, whoops about Ebert!

  • @Grady - Regarding Ebert, maybe you should put a note in your video of the mistake.=)

  • @AndyNRK Done!  Good idea!

  • I agree with Judge on the same point. Movie industry will loss their competitive edge to DVD and piracy if they do not come up with some new ways to entertain audience. Although 3D is nothing new, it does provide relatively "new" experience that otherwise will draw less customers to big screen in our challenging economy.

  • @cjosephwu good point! I hope we can work out a better system, though, for the pricing. Maybe you could get in at a discounted price if you bring your own 3D glasses?

see all

All Comments (46)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @alecton Finally someone makes sense, I've been trying to get the ball rolling telling people about it, but people just hear digital and think that it's supposed to be more expensive. That's why ticket prices are so hight, the noobs haven't made a case for cheaper ticket prices.

  • Did you ever notice that films have been done FOR FINANCIAL GAIN? Gawwd you tool, whatev...

  • Even though I didn't like your accent as much, I'd trust everything you've said simply cuz you're hot.

  • @deltajuliet His face capture tech man.....are you serious that man made the realest looking CGI ever to date looked like a real face, plus the 3d wasnt that hard on the eye

  • 3d isn't even that impressive.

  • Mate, you think $14.75 is expensive? I live in central London & the normal ticket here costs roughly £15.00 and in $ that is around 20-25.......

  • 3D + Digital Projection SHOULD be cheaper than single 35mm movies. Two digital cameras save 1.6 million dollars in celluloid expenses alone: lab, inter-positive and dailies (according to 2002 figures). So, the film industry should have the same price for 3D and get rid of 35mm projection altogether (all films do digital intermediate anyways). 35mm is so expensive to print and transport, and in a weak economy, it will keep Digital prices up. Digital Bails out 35mm. Trash 35, keep 3D = cheaper txs

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more