Michael Savage - Stem Cell Scientist Says: "No need for EMBRYONIC stem cells in researching cures"
Top Comments
All Comments (85)
-
@ferrer65 The woman control hormones and other chemicals that casn intervene the the baby. Basically, whatever the woman feels, then the babby will feel. Not against you or with you. Just letting you know. Education for the good!
-
@zcaz23 woah 6 month ago I posted this? Anyways, I hope we can find out more about the mysteries of life by using embryonic stem cells. Hopefully we can also have a successful thereputic cloning.
I really want to have a child that is reproductive cloned.
I do not support abortion, However I suppose embryonic stem cell research. (less than 4 days old egg is not that bad to test on)
-
@killerboyfoolz Oi, hope you're kidding.. forget everything Einstein said and did if not.
-
@kazuya1196 I'm not a hypocrite. I don't see a problem with killing babies, really. They don't develop human tendancies until they're at least nine months old. Therefore, I see no difference between killing a fetus and killing a baby under nine months. See? I'm not a hypocrite. I just happen to think fully-grown people with personalities and unique brains are more important than a meat sack that has less intelligence than a fucking cat.
-
@Skynamo .....interesting way to put it. Death for thought crime. Why is choice dangerous ? Is it fair for so many to suffer ?
-
It should be made law to execute people that think as dangerously as the likes of you, my friend.
-
@GeneralHoohah i agree completley,too many people with no knowledge of biology whatsoever have an opinion on this.
-
What is the greater evil ? An unwanted, neglected baby and child ......or abortion ? The world is overpopulated.
This is a woman's choice............period and is legal. If made illegal it will still happen only in an unsafe manner.
-
Once she said she is religious, I have to say FUCK adult stem cell and long live embryonic stem cell.
This is why you shouldn't include religion is any arguments. -.-
-
@elperropatron That was...civilized.
That kind of reasoning is very nihilistic and dangerous. Fetus over 27 weeks have neural activity in the brain, and babies do not have cognitive abilities until they are a few months old. How do you justify that killing babies outside the womb is illegal but legal inside the womb using the same logic? Lobsters cannot feel pain yet many vegans and liberals do NOT eat them yet these same vegans and liberals you'll find at pro-choice rallies. Hypocrisy at its finest.
kazuya1196 2 years ago 9
How do you know it dosen't feel pain? When a pregnant woman argues with someone and becomes very upset, the baby can be born with problems with the Nervous system. why if he dosen't feel anything? at eight weeks a baby has a heart beat. If we can get stem cells from other places that isn't embryonic and is just as good or better, then why not go with that?
ferrer65 2 years ago 8