Evolutionists vs Evolution

An interesting video that clearly shows how Evolutionists fight against Evolution because they cannot agree on something unreal, and because they force themselves and others to believe a pseudo science this is what happens all the time!

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Evolutionists
• Evolution
• creationism
• intelligent design

[Raptor302]

You would make a convicted felon a center piece of your argument. Tell MR Hovind to try and not drop the soap, will ya? Those primal urges of his fellow inmates just might kick in and then he'll get a lesson in social evolution that he probably doesn't want.

[gchinnici1974]

@Raptor302 No I would not. The center piece of the argument is the argument itself, and not the carrier of it. Mr Hovind made some huge mistakes, and he is paying for it...but this does not demolish the argument. If you are seriously interested in the truth you can read the book "Bones of contention", if you are not...my communications ends here. As a follower of Christ I will not beg you to ask God to help you find the answer, Christ never begged people to follow Him, neither do I

[gchinnici1974]

We could talk for ever....The point is that nothing come from nothing. We all agree with that! Therefore the first cause must be the God which is NOT a self created existence - because nothing cannot create Himself (in this case the GOD) - but GOD must be ONE and must also be self existent. The silly thing is not to accept that and keep trying forever to explain things which can never be explained without GOD. About 6,000 years, and the pride of certain men keeps suggesting. I will get it myself

[Philos2006]

gchinnici1974----First of all it is NOT the majority of scientists who believe in evolution---

You can deny anything you want. It just proves, that you didn`t do any research.

[gchinnici1974]

How many paleoanthropologists do we have today? Can you name at least five of them who have accessed the original objects of their studies? If YES, can you provide specific dates and locations? How much time do paleoanthropologist spend examining the original object of their studies? What does the term australopithecine refer to?

[gchinnici1974]

Can you name at least five, fully accepted as legitimate by the scientific community, australopithecines?

[Frankgone2010]

Great vids bro.

[IanErc]

You'd have to be thick as two short planks to think this is in any way an argument against evolution.

But then if you are a creationist you are pretty much declaring yourself as not having any critical faculty.

[chinnicig]

@Carnage2K4....In your opinion are we done with DNA or RNA studies? If not why not? If yes, why so...? Before you mention any copy and pasted titles (I could do the same) that might look fancy ;-) I would strongly recommend to study the following from Louis Agassiz: The structure of animal life and A life in science. After the reading of these two books I'll be more open to more discussion. I am not evading...I am challenging. I am willing to wait. I have been in touch with many for a long time

[Carnage2K4]

Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve, Endogenous retroviruses, Yolk Sacks on Human Embryos, Inner Cell Disk at 5 Days Gestation (hard egg related), The Lanugo, Junk DNA, The Auriculares muscles, The Plantaris Muscle, Wisdom Teeth, The Coccyx, The Appendix, Human Chromosome 2, The inability of human L-ascorbate Synthesis, The Lizards of Pod Kopiste & Pod Mrcaru, Parthenogenesis in Many Lizard's, The Lenski Experiment, Antibiotics Resistance in Bacteria,

[Frizzail420]

if animals evolved from other life forms then we would hav to see a progression of fossils thru the layers of strata, not only that but the fossils in each layer of strata should appear to graduate into eachother in form , which is exactly wut we do see.we could just as easily found a big random cluster of fossils that shared absolutely no similarities with any living thing, but we don't we see exactly wut is required for the theory of evolution to hav happened

[Frizzail420]

1:00 to 1:12 is not wut its made out to be, and very sneaky and underhanded lol

Fossils are facts we find them all the time, and the fossil record is just one of many facts that support the theory of evolution, ie: DNA, comparative anatomy etc...

Wut the man means is that even without the fossil record we would still know that evolution happened because all of the evidence we find points straight towards it...it just as easily could pointed to something else but it doesn't

[Frizzail420]

this video is so dishonest

[Raptor302]

@gchinnici1974 The argument itself is a compilation of strawman fallacies. Not only did humans evolve from primates, we still are primates. That is not an opinion. Watch Aronra's foundational falsehoods of creationism here on youtube. If not, then my communication ends here as well. Truth is an investigation, not a predetermined conclusion like religion is.

[ryan84160]

@chuyaventuras Why is it stupid ? Just saying hey thats stupid does not make it so, you must provide evidence as to why you think it is stupid.