Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Holocaust Denial Movie Debunked Part 2: Water Well

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
4,257
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 27, 2007

Thanks to building services engineer Highope1 for his refutation, sent to me by mail.

Denierbud thinks that he has proved that the water in the well of the extermination area in Treblinka would have been infected. Fortunately, thanks to the help of a building services engineer, we are all able to see that Denierbud's episode 2 is an utter speculation. We go into physical geography of soil and the way water reacts with it under various circumstances. It should also be noted that Denierbud's estimate of 100 pounds per corpse s unreasonable, as I shall show in a forthcoming video.

  • likes, 46 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (sobe104839)

  • Klaatuuns:

    fabrications layered upon stupendous devisements

    Got anything to show for this claim or did you just dream up something again?

Top Comments

  • Hey kid, you can drink that water..I wouldnt. Are you for real? Are you in special ed or something? No guard would have drank that crap. Why dont we just drink out of our toilets? You are incredible. That man gave scientific explanations for the area. You speak in generalities. The burden of proof is on you. Show us the bodies. What an idiot you are.

  • This video debunks nothing. It only proves the original video.

see all

All Comments (143)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @mindprism

    "What is your source for your beliefs?".

    LOL!

    Only 66 years of historical research, the consensus of all the world's top historians, the findings of numerous court cases and forensic investigations, the convergence of tens of thousands of eyewitnesses and hundreds of thousands - if not millions - of documents in archives spread over an entire continent.

    And you wonder why I find you ridiculous?

  • @mindprism

    "No mention of gas chambers or an extermination policy targeting Jews is made in the 1947" etc.

    So, one of the most heavily documented episodes in history did not happen because four words did not appear in three books.

    Churchill, de Gaulle and Eisenhower never mentioned the battle of Kursk in their memoirs, so I guess that never happened either.

    Terrifying.

  • @MSM4U2POM No mention of gas chambers or an extermination policy targeting Jews is made in the 1947 edition of Encyclopaedia Brittanica -- in describing fate of the European Jews under National Socialist rule and occupation, by American-Jewish historian Jacob Marcus one of the foremost contemporary experts on Jewish history. Leaving the reader with the impression that Marcus did not put credence in the mass gassing allegations. This description remained the same in the 1952 and 1957 editions.

  • @MSM4U2POM I am simply asking you to provide testimony and evidence that is convincing to you. Instead, you offer ridicule and laughter.

    Is maturity also too much to ask for, as well as evidence and credible witnesses.

    How many people do YOU believe had direct participation in the systematic murders, what is your source for your beliefs?

  • @mindprism

    "Back up your assertion".

    This just gets funnier and funnier. Why in God's name do I need to prove anything which is taught globally and which you can't change a crumb of, mate? If you choose to deny it, then it is your problem, not mine.

  • @MSM4U2POM {there are many more which are}

    Back up your assertion. Provide a link to your reliable witnesses. Provide a link to reliable evidence also.

  • @mindprism

    ""Virtually all of the US investigators" etc.

    LOL!

    The opinion of one man does not discredit what is legally, forensically and historically proven, mate. Dachau was just a tiny part of the holocaust, and even if what he says is true, it doesn't even dent the overall narrative. The same goes for Krakowski: for every one testimony he might deem unreliable, there are many more which are.

    You're clutching at straws, bud. Try again.

  • @MSM4U2POM Virtually all of the US investigators who brought cases before American military courts at Dachau were "Jewish refugees from Germany" who "hated the Germans," recalled Joseph Halow, a US Army court reporter at the Dachau trials in 1947. "Many of the investigators gave vent to their hated by attempting to force confessions from the Germans by treating them brutally," including "severe beatings."

    -- J. Halow, "Innocent at Dachau," Journal of Historical Review, Winter 1989-90, p. 459

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more