Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

The Hawking Paradox (Part 5)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
76,329
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 1, 2007

A discussion on the life of Stephen Hawking and the topic of information loss in a black hole.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 3 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • It's a shame that a mind like his is trapped in a nearly useless body, while useless minds are able to make use of a perfectly useful body.

  • @MPETE1976 its easy for people to mock him but imo i doubt anyone of those other sceintists could of attained the same level of achievement in the realm of sceince if they had the same condition...does it look easy living in that body......-_-

see all

All Comments (227)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @clgrnt it is because he attained a useless body, that he was able to develop his mind!

  • @gukonni in your mind god is real in others its debated and challenged whats wrong with that. koolaid drinking idiot I go on whats been proven not written in a book. books often brainwash people. start thinking for yourself instead taking easy route. i study physics religion paranormal stuff Hawking is Genuis and i seen crazy stuff happen who is right will prob be never be known prob until you die.

  • @gukonni Yes because thousand year old myths, rejected by the smartest people on Earth, are the most important thing in life....

  • U can do et!

  • does anyone know the song that plays around the 5 minute mark when it explains his new idea? sounds epic.

  • @BagarozziBoi True, though I'm uncertain if that's negative. If the number of people within mathematics increase, either in percentage or number, that would still make a collective development that single individuals might not be able to achieve on their own. Although I believe one can expect notorious scientists and mathematicians to emerge in any near future anyway.

  • @Thatmetaldude590 And in maths nowadays it's even more grim. Who's heard of Wiles for example, (proved Fermat's last theorem). This is partly because modern maths and physics are so vast and varied nowadays that since about the 60's is very difficult for "giants" of the field to emerge. Perhaps Feynman/Schwinger/Gell-Mann etc were the leading figures of the final 'epic' generation.

  • @gukonni I thought there were more than two to choose from. To which two are you refering? Personally I worship Bhaal the demon lord of entropy ... please tell me i picked the right one, you've got me worried now!

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more