So let me get this straight, seeing as Miller showed a simpler system exists in whales, do we now believe that whales mutated to have that missing part before the whale turned into a human. Wouldn't a open minded evo demand proof that the human system is found in a water based animal. Seems to me one system works in water and the other works on land only. Show me where one system is found in the opposite environment.
how is this an argument if he actually admits that if you just knock out two of the components it doesnt function in humans. Even if he gets down to a cell and discovers it only needs 3 parts thats still IRREDUCIBLY COMPLEX so who's owned now?
@hisham031170 Thats right my friend.Evolutionists wont think how is impossible, for example, the digestive system to evolve.What evolved first?The mouth?The stomach?Oh never mind.Somehow happened...
Ken Miller failed. If he removed any of the protein and the human's blood still clot, then he's correct, otherwise he's bullshitting and those worship him are gullible idiots. Behe was correct all the way.
@foresigns My thoughts exactly. This video is the best refuter I have seen yet, however he still leaves questions hanging, has logic flaws like what you pointed out, and glosses over these questions by cleverly hiding behind theories that only work in cleverly designed words. I still think there is an enormous amount of proof for macro evolution though. I'm wondering if a union of these theories is the answer.
So let me get this straight, seeing as Miller showed a simpler system exists in whales, do we now believe that whales mutated to have that missing part before the whale turned into a human. Wouldn't a open minded evo demand proof that the human system is found in a water based animal. Seems to me one system works in water and the other works on land only. Show me where one system is found in the opposite environment.
ian9toes 1 month ago
@jelleepit Exactly bro, blood clotting, no matter what he was bullshitting, remains an IC.
archilles1195 6 months ago
if you look for what I wrote above you will see this Video is based on a misquote
eballest7 7 months ago
look for : "Ken Miller's Only a Theory Misquotes Michael Behe on"
on g o o gle
eballest7 7 months ago
Ken Miller MISQUOTED Behe in this Video.
Check out the website, so you can see for yourself.
eballest7 7 months ago
ID works like this:
1) Find system that looks designed
2) Declare that no natural explanation can explain its existence
3) Conclude magic man did it
xenoknight696 9 months ago
how is this an argument if he actually admits that if you just knock out two of the components it doesnt function in humans. Even if he gets down to a cell and discovers it only needs 3 parts thats still IRREDUCIBLY COMPLEX so who's owned now?
jelleepit 9 months ago in playlist informative
@hisham031170 Thats right my friend.Evolutionists wont think how is impossible, for example, the digestive system to evolve.What evolved first?The mouth?The stomach?Oh never mind.Somehow happened...
pppaaaooo13 1 year ago
Ken Miller failed. If he removed any of the protein and the human's blood still clot, then he's correct, otherwise he's bullshitting and those worship him are gullible idiots. Behe was correct all the way.
hisham031170 1 year ago
@foresigns My thoughts exactly. This video is the best refuter I have seen yet, however he still leaves questions hanging, has logic flaws like what you pointed out, and glosses over these questions by cleverly hiding behind theories that only work in cleverly designed words. I still think there is an enormous amount of proof for macro evolution though. I'm wondering if a union of these theories is the answer.
n3wbuo 1 year ago