Ken Miller talks about the evolution of blood clotting

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
8,521
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 25, 2007

Another pillar of intelligent design, the blood clotting system, is discussed by Dr. Ken Miller.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 12 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (112)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • So let me get this straight, seeing as Miller showed a simpler system exists in whales, do we now believe that whales mutated to have that missing part before the whale turned into a human. Wouldn't a open minded evo demand proof that the human system is found in a water based animal. Seems to me one system works in water and the other works on land only. Show me where one system is found in the opposite environment.

  • @jelleepit Exactly bro, blood clotting, no matter what he was bullshitting, remains an IC.

  • if you look for what I wrote above you will see this Video is based on a misquote

  • look for : "Ken Miller's Only a Theory Misquotes Michael Behe on"

    on g o o gle

  • Ken Miller MISQUOTED Behe in this Video.

    Check out the website, so you can see for yourself.

  • ID works like this:

    1) Find system that looks designed

    2) Declare that no natural explanation can explain its existence

    3) Conclude magic man did it

  • how is this an argument if he actually admits that if you just knock out two of the components it doesnt function in humans. Even if he gets down to a cell and discovers it only needs 3 parts thats still IRREDUCIBLY COMPLEX so who's owned now?

  • @hisham031170 Thats right my friend.Evolutionists wont think how is impossible, for example, the digestive system to evolve.What evolved first?The mouth?The stomach?Oh never mind.Somehow happened...

  • Ken Miller failed. If he removed any of the protein and the human's blood still clot, then he's correct, otherwise he's bullshitting and those worship him are gullible idiots. Behe was correct all the way.

  • @foresigns My thoughts exactly. This video is the best refuter I have seen yet, however he still leaves questions hanging, has logic flaws like what you pointed out, and glosses over these questions by cleverly hiding behind theories that only work in cleverly designed words. I still think there is an enormous amount of proof for macro evolution though. I'm wondering if a union of these theories is the answer.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more