True just intonation requires moving the frets, and considering that most of the music I play is intended for an instrument of equal temperament, that is just not a great choice for me.
Without the extra rhythm being driven by another instrument, I wanted to give the musical priority to the melodic structure; by slowing it down I thought to give the listener a better chance to catch the contour without just shoving all the motion in their face by taking it at the marked speed. As a composer before being a guitarist, I think Harrison would have respected that choice.
Thank you all very much for your comments. to gmedina1988 & zapharatu, I can't afford a just-intoned guitar, and gauging out separate strings for a single piece of music seemed impractical for my purposes. If I were to perform the entire suite I would use a second instrument and set it up that way. Also, I chose to take the piece slower that the marked tempo because I'm not using a percussionist.
gmedina1988 is actually right. While I don't think there is anything wrong with taking the piece slower (it still sounds good at a slower tempo) the piece is technically supposed to be played on a guitar set up for just intonation. But that is understandably hard to do. The piece still sounds beautiful in equal temperment though. But just intonation does add a lot of subtle beauty. I'm not criticisizing your playing of course, you play the piece very well.
dude calm down, just trying to give you a little constructive criticism. i was just saying because i heard if from men who knew and studied with lou harrison. No need to get your panties in a bunch.
your playing it too slow, it supposed to be a bit faster. and it sound nicer if you can find guitar that has been tuned and fretted for just intonation
True just intonation requires moving the frets, and considering that most of the music I play is intended for an instrument of equal temperament, that is just not a great choice for me.
jabornfield 2 years ago
Without the extra rhythm being driven by another instrument, I wanted to give the musical priority to the melodic structure; by slowing it down I thought to give the listener a better chance to catch the contour without just shoving all the motion in their face by taking it at the marked speed. As a composer before being a guitarist, I think Harrison would have respected that choice.
jabornfield 2 years ago
Thank you all very much for your comments. to gmedina1988 & zapharatu, I can't afford a just-intoned guitar, and gauging out separate strings for a single piece of music seemed impractical for my purposes. If I were to perform the entire suite I would use a second instrument and set it up that way. Also, I chose to take the piece slower that the marked tempo because I'm not using a percussionist.
jabornfield 2 years ago
gmedina1988 is actually right. While I don't think there is anything wrong with taking the piece slower (it still sounds good at a slower tempo) the piece is technically supposed to be played on a guitar set up for just intonation. But that is understandably hard to do. The piece still sounds beautiful in equal temperment though. But just intonation does add a lot of subtle beauty. I'm not criticisizing your playing of course, you play the piece very well.
zapharatu 2 years ago
I second that! Would Love to hear the other movements. This is beautiful. Thanks for sharing.
syr1811 3 years ago
dude calm down, just trying to give you a little constructive criticism. i was just saying because i heard if from men who knew and studied with lou harrison. No need to get your panties in a bunch.
gmedina1988 3 years ago
aight chef well if you know everything pick up your guitar and play it.
plrCounterpoint 3 years ago
your playing it too slow, it supposed to be a bit faster. and it sound nicer if you can find guitar that has been tuned and fretted for just intonation
gmedina1988 3 years ago
what a great suite this is...do you have the rest of the mvts?
Thanks!
arash402003 3 years ago
mmm. love this.
cheriemargot 4 years ago