Windsor building on fire

Madrid skyscraper burning down

Category:

Travel & Events

Tags:

• Madrid
• Windsor
• tower
• inferno
• fir

[thedman113]

"You do know that there was a building between building 7 and 1 it was building 6, so your telling me as it collapsed the debris "jumped over" building 6 and fell on 7?"

Nope, it hit that too. Building 6 was crushed.

[pussypitcher]

that you can't find anything about thermite, doesn't mean, that there wasn't any literature about it.

[chevytheplayer]

thousands of tons??? seriously???

You do know that there was a building between building 7 and 1 it was building 6, so your telling me as it collapsed the debris "jumped over" building 6 and fell on 7?

Seriously??

Your debunkers are seriously starting to sound crazy, and desperate, and its sad

[horrabilly]

By all means.

Please respond to the 5 points I just brought up..

[aurumdeus]

First things first if you want to actually discuss this properly, please leave out the labels etc. They aren't neccessary and really dont help things.

Lets see tomorrow what Farmer's got to say? After that I'll get on with answering things.

[horrabilly]

4. the red paint chips (which is what truthers point to for the nano thermite claim) were made by a paint company in Kansas (I think), and guess what??? When asked for the chemicals which went into making the primer paint (which was sprayed on in 1977, was nano thermite around in 1977?) they reply with a list of chemicals including.... wait for it.... sulpher, iron oxide and aluminum.

5. If it was nanothermite on the beams, why didnt' they ignite when welded together in 1977????

thanks

[horrabilly]

3. the chemical signatures of thermite (even nano thermite) are full of sulphur, aluminum, and iron oxide. what was the tower filled with? oh, drywall and concrete... what are they filled with? sulphur. The towers were filled with metal like... aluminum. And since the towers were made from steel and iron, could there be RUST anywhere? Oh all over the place.

so nano thermite? maybe. But elimianate all of the other possibliities first. which you can't. so nano thermite? nope

[horrabilly]

ROFLMAO.

Oh thank you little truther. I do love waking up to a good joke.

1. ah the nano thermite argument... yes. In the Open chemistry journal. Yup.

now you have found the SMOKING gun.

oh wait. No steel showed any signs of MELTING. So no thermtie was used.

2. nano thermite. when was that invented again? Before 2001? really? I can't find any literature to suggest it even existed until very recently.

[aurumdeus]

seems to me a 'truther' in your view is someone who differs in oppinion to yourself.

First things first I certainly dont support the taliban, or any of their actions (other than stopping heroin production in afgan, which the americans seem in capable of doing).

Apart from any other piece of evidence to either side, explain why the rubble waas laced with nano thermite exactly?

[horrabilly]

wow.

Just like a truther. Immediately come out the NAZI references.

It is amazing.

Calling the US government NAZI's, while standing idly by and covering for people who murdered 3000 Americans, (and were hoping for MANY more).

The same people who kidnap and behead foreigners. The same people who want to drop a nuke on israel, the same people who beat girls for listening to music, and behead girls who want to go to school.

yup... I know who the NAZI's are there.