Time lapse getting younger

This is a series of 8 photos taken from may 27 to July 5, 2009. If you look carefully, several changes will be noticed. the bags under my eyes are getting smaller, the hair is growing in blacker, and finally the hair growth is showing up as denser hair from the May 27 picture. The face is looking younger. For those of you that are into meditation, this liquid clears the nadis and awakens the Kundalini. Ask me about it. .

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• getting
• yhounger
• benjamin
• buttons
• hair
• restoration
• bags
• under
• eyes
• revesatrol
• Kundalini
• nadis
• clearing

[bigfuzzybear789]

gay go die old man

[MIBxXxX]

what...



[UpForDanceroid]

i see the same dude all pics... :l

[michaelcweir]

I have posted another video showing the difference over time to today. check it out.

[michaelcweir]

I've thought extensively why I claim the effects that I do, because none of the of the other products make claims that I do for PRANA Water, or are pale comparisons for the claims I make. In nature or even in farms, the blue-green algae is a best exposed to 1% of the available light possible. The way I grow the algae, all of the algae receives 100% of the sunlight for algae to process at night. Second, when the algae is dried by others, they oxidize micronutrients in the process, Who are you?

[michaelcweir]

If you bothered to look at some of my earlier videos, there are links to sites that sell dried blue-green algae, with analysis and test information, going back twenty years. Even if they had not provided evidence of their claims, the placebo effect wears off after 4-6 months. 20 years is a long time for the placebo effect, especially since the product is $20 or more per month. Don't rely on my say-so, look for yourself.

[wretcherwretch]

I've still asked you for some evidence, perhaps organic chemistry?, of why this liquid would do anything but stimulate the placebo effect.

And where'd I attack google? That's a silly little ad hominem ;)

[michaelcweir]

So my question to you, where are the facts to support that I altered the movies I posted to Google? Once posted, there is no way to alter the video, except to remove it. To repost it will put a different time stamp on it. So when I say examine the video before April 2009, that video data was posted before April 2009. So my face, which was posted then, could have been altered to look older then, and I really look younger now. But I can refer to people who know me and are using the water now.

[michaelcweir]

When you can't attack the argument, attack the person instead. You cannot argue that Google had some part in this supposed fraud, so you are saying that I altered the Google data in some way? Darwin mostly collected data, and then proposed the theory of evolution. Darwin then wrote a book, the internet of his day. The default for good science is to keep an open mind, not a closed one. You can question facts and theories, but you are just manufacturing objections based on incorrect perception.

[wretcherwretch]

Again, you're attempting to provide circumstantial evidence (at BEST) and trying to argue that, because of pictures you may easily have edited, posted out of order, or whatever (so many different options at your disposal), that you're somehow following a scientific method is silly at best, and you know it. The default of scientists is skepticism, and if you're not okay with that, feel free to appeal to the un-scientific audience. Which you're doing anyway by using youtube.

Cheers.