tooltime rejects evidence without investigation

tooltime9901 make unrealistic demands for evidence before he will admit it is rational to suspect that there may have been more involved than the official government-approved conspiracy theory regarding 9/11 terror attacks.

Even if a 'paper trail' exists, does he honestly think the criminals will gladly hand over the evidence that exposes their complicity?

NIST reference to 'free fall'

http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/factsheet/wtc_faqs_082006.cfm

NIST FAQ under Question 6:

'As documented in Section 6.14.4 of NIST NCSTAR 1, these collapse times show that:

"... the structure below the level of collapse initiation offered minimal resistance to the falling building mass at and above the impact zone. The potential energy released by the downward movement of the large building mass far exceeded the capacity of the intact structure below to absorb that energy through energy of deformation.

Since the stories below the level of collapse initiation provided little resistance to the tremendous energy released by the falling building mass, the building section above came down essentially in FREE FALL, as seen in videos. As the stories below sequentially failed, the falling mass increased, further increasing the demand on the floors below, which were unable to arrest the moving mass." '

Category:

Education

Tags:

• tooltime
• rejects
• evidence
• proudfootz
• owns
• tooltime9901
• unrealistic
• demands
• paper
• trail
• cheney
• halliburton
• conflict
• interest
• cia
• false
• flag
• 9/11
• terror
• propaganda
• story
• embedded
• reporter
• secret
• agent
• journalist
• white
• house
• payroll

[AstronautJ]

"My theory is correct, it's just really hard to get the evidence."

-"So you don't have it?"

"I have lots of evidence!"

-"Okay, show me the proof."

"It's really hard to get..."

-"................."

[proudfootz]

@AstronautJ

Good to see you and the voices in your head are having a wonderful time! ;)

[AstronautJ]

@proudfootz Yes, please do brush the point of the comment aside with sarcasm. I wouldn't want you to face the problem presented.

I'll dumb it down for you, as you seem to need it: if you have the evidence, show us. Right now. Don't say it's hard to get or that people don't want us to see - you saw it, right? So it's possible. Show us that. Go ahead. I'll wait.

[proudfootz]

@AstronautJ

You have a problem? Why is that suddenly my problem?

Everything I have to say about tooltime's batshit crazy video is up there.

If you have a hard time with that do I have to dumb it down for you?

[ctcole77]

3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:

If NORAD was told to “stand down” how do you explain F-15 fighters ordered to intercept the high-jacked planes 6 minutes after WTC 1 was hit?

How can Dick Cheney order NORAD to “stand down” if he was never in charge of NORAD?

If WTC 7 was destroyed via controlled demolition, how do you explain firefighters predicting the building's collapse 7 hours in advance?

[ctcole77]

@proudfootz

Tick tock, tick tock, tick tock.

As we speak your precious paint chips - I mean thermite dust is being tested.

And this time we have a non-911 twoofer scientist doing the testing.

One more thing gullible shill. Freefall is not a speed. LMAO!

911 TRUTH DEBUNKED!

[vengencefrom1979]

@proudfootz did you know that 88 is 'secret code' for HH which stands for heil hitler in nazism? did you know that 88 in binary code almost matches db10001110101 exactly? interesting tidbit about db10001110101. operating as he does.