Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Clinton Tries to Calm Angry Pakistanis

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton came face-to-face Friday with simmering Pakistani anger over U.S. aerial drone attacks in their country (Oct. 30)  
 
Customize

More From: AssociatedPress

QuickList(0)

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
12 ratings
Sign in to rate
1,607 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (57)   Options

Loading...
Comment(s) marked as spam Show
studape (1 month ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
The Us is destabilizing Pakistan to crate a "national Security Situation", then we can stay and destabilize Russia and China and control the gas fields of that part of Asia. The wars are lies and criminal. At the start Hillary was describing the US when she talked about the attacks in Pakistan.
AwesomeTruth1982 (1 month ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
I dont understand what US wants from Pakistan, a 3rd word developing country the size of California.

How come US, a superpower, is having so much trouble in that region.

Why cant we just go back to the time before 9/11/2001 and stop these wars.
PanzerBlitz43 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Westerners didn't invent technology either.. they stole it. Their only asset is murder and theft. They're the stupidest races in the world.
charlessmyth (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
If westerners stole the technology, as you claim, how come that those from whom the theft occurred, are not much more advanced than they currently are.
charlessmyth (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Perhaps. But the until recently camel trading post of Abu Dhabi wouldn't be holding F1 Grand prix races without them :-)
PanzerBlitz43 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
too bad to destroy your delusions but.. US did practice genocide, they did practice Nazi tactics, they did loot, raze and siege towns, bomb/randomly slaughter civilians, they did cause over a million dead with an equal number maimed and wounded. US/Brit crimes in Iraq are on the level of the Nazi invasions or European colonial slaughters. US did create Al Qaeda, public bombing, civil war in Iraq where there was none. You clearly are in that group of US/european bush loving child killing thugs.
charlessmyth (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
You are clearly working from the premise that the status-quo of the ruthlessly vicious sub-human which pertains to the region, can be attributed to the US, the EU and the former colonial powers. That said, whilst Nazi Germany did live down to that standard, it is not the hallmark of contemporary interventions. However, as per Lt.Col. Ralph Peters and his comments in respect of the much vaunted bogeyman of Eurabia, it would be wise for Islamists to not push their luck.
PanzerBlitz43 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
So what do you call a million dead with shock and awe.. status quo? or collateral damage? What about Vietnam? And communism, invented in Europe & exported to Russia and the millions dead from that? The French in Algeria? Just a couple of examples of western genocidal wars, there's dozens. Westerners aren't innocent of modern terrorism methods, either.. they practically invented it. The modern genocides of Asia and Africa wouldn't have happened without European colonialism.
charlessmyth (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
The modern African genocides are a consequence of colonialism to the extent that a number of nation states were established, and not declined at the Addis conference, and there was a population explosion in sub-Saharan Africa. Prior to the establishment of Rhodesia in 1890, the population of what is now the failed state of Zimbabwe, was less than 400,000 instead of the 13-million of today. Communism was popular because it led to the democracy, like in Zimbabwe, of: one man one vote once.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.