Bible Archeology Research Promo
Loading...
355
views
Loading...
Uploader Comments (VortexDelta)
see all
All Comments (10)
-
Test.
-
Your video is blanking lame.
-
I don't permit cussing on this page.
Loading...
Red Sea crossing is infantilism
lizazoon 1 year ago
Explain? Why do serious scientists consider it a valid area for the Red Sea crossing site?
VortexDelta 1 year ago
@VortexDelta : May I kindly suggest that you visit the website Of answersingenesisdotorg/creation, whose goals are I quote" Our purpose is to equip you, our reader, with practical answers so you can confidently communicate the gospel and biblical authority with accuracy. " You will see the truth about all those so called Wyatt discoveries. It`s all BS.
lizazoon 1 year ago
@lizazoon - the person who has formulated the AIG viewpoint on Wyatt's work is Andrew Snelling. I talked to Snelling twice, each time showing evidence of the pattern of iron. The first time I showed him 1985 footage, done by the initial researchers. The second time came from my metal detection work, of which the videos you see here. Snelling said that when he wrote his article that it was the best information that he had at the time. He has done no further work and hasn't been to the site
VortexDelta 1 year ago
@VortexDelta I do not need experts sir. All you need is common sense. The greatest wooden ship built by an army of shipbuilding experts in the last century was quickly demolished, because it was not seaworthy. But NOAH on his own, built an even larger ship 3.000 years ago. WHAT CHILDISH NONSENSE. Sorry I cannot describe it better.
lizazoon 1 year ago
@lizazoon - actually, do a yahoo search on Chinese Treasure ships. Also do a youtube search. The ships were 450-500ft long and were a fleet of them. They were successful ships. They have even recovered a rudder from one of those ships.
VortexDelta 1 year ago