Ralph Nader: 2012 Presidential Election

Ralph Nader: 2012 Presidential Election New Strategy for Presidential Debates http://punkpatriot.blogspot.com/ thank you for reposting this and everyone else who has as well. I f you repost this at your site please send me a message so I can send you traffic in return.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Ralph Nader
• 2012 Presidential Election
• running
• third party
• obama

[Anglagard1]

Mr. Nader, it is up to you to annoint your successor. We will likely follow.

[Yankhadenough]

@quinnthology31 thank you for clearing that up! Ralph Nader is Thomas Jefferson of our times, Ron Paul is feudal lord way before Constitution ever existed.

[JdawgTheFirst]

So I guess that he's not running, I voted for you Nader, I voted for Obummer in the primary when I was more naive and younger in my study of politics on Youtube. lol, I regret that every day now.

[zaxtor]

Nader would make a good president because he is anti-war, pro-environment and more.

Ron Paul is a hick who is anti-environment, pro-oil pro-ANWR drilling etc.

if someone is anti-environment they're pro-manhater, pro-animal hater, pro-self hater but pro-profit. If the environment dies, we all die.

It doesn't just make these oil drilling assholes suffer when they drill and pollute the environment.

It make EVERYTHING on Earth suffer.

So Ron Paul should return in his trailer home and laid down.

[bkl139]

Ron/Ralph 2012



[bottle2lip]

lol the EPA isn't there to protect the environment whatsoever. Only to protect the interest of large corporations from being sued by land owners for example if there is a chemical spill on their land. EPA protects them completely. Research it

[strawberri12345]

Nader=Best Citizen ever, hands down. If you don't know his influence on you personally check out Ralph Nader: An Unreasonable Man on Netflix.

[TheVideo5094]

@quinnthology31 They Work together, Both of them would Make GREAT Presidents.

So don't insult Ron Paul.

[Comanglia]

@quinnthology31 Uhh, Nader is anti-government for Social issues, but pro-government for economic issues.

[xrsist]

@derpstep I haven't seen anywhere where he specifically denies climate change. While at the surface, I disagree with him when he says things like dismantling the EPA, or FEMA, but if you listen beyond that, he talks about how these agencies are susceptible to be manipulated by lobbyist. It would be easier to manage if these agencies were controlled by the state, hence Paul's message about more control and regulation at the state level.