LabVIEW Sucks
Top Comments
All Comments (17)
-
to summarize, LabVIEW sucks
-
labview sucks only to non users, we use it for our automotive and aerospace divisions...
-
@jshowa7 have you tried using a property value node for that boolean upon exiting the VI?
-
This maybe my fault for not being comfortable with LabVIEW, but I've seen some real creepy stuff happen with the language. One of them being a constant boolean changing to false when it should be true upon closing a background process that communicates via UDP to a front end GUI. It kept it state by somehow attaching an indicator to it. Without it, it leaves the TCP connection hanging and you have to reboot the machine in order to close the connection.
-
LabVIEW sucks. Period.
-
Labview is riddled with bugs and very poorly documented. The latest version is incredibly unstable. If it weren't for the HUNDREDS of bugs in it (check the forums and known issues notes to confirm this fact) it would be a really neat programming language.
-
Labview is riddled with bugs and very poorly documented. The latest version is incredibly unstable. If it weren't for the HUNDREDS of bugs in it (check the forums and known issues notes to confirm this fact) it would be a really neat programming language.
-
While I prefer open source software for our projects to help close the digital gap for the impoverished and help people across the income divide, I LOVE this video and the way it shows how irrational some people become against tools that remove barriers to entry based on obfuscation. Labview is great, it just is too expensive for our purposes.
-
lul comic language is comic language
It's sexually really easy
sako36 10 months ago 9
LabVIEW would be loved by the masses if it wasn't a proprietary language. You can only write LabVIEW using LabVIEW's IDE... which is the bane of my entire LabVIEW programming existence. I can write .NET code in a Notepad clone. Why can't I write LabVIEW code in an Paintbrush clone? :P
protospherex 10 months ago