Shanedk loses debate, gets upset

For the many YouTubers out there who have become tired of Shanedk's double standards of debate, here is an amusing video that highlights The World of Logic According to Shane

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• shanedk
• libertarian
• monopoly

[billburns2]

@loveofphysics It's funny how many amateur economists never got past chapter one. They see S&D as some kind of sacred formula that applies to everything all of the time

[islamiscrap8888]

That what is true? that campaign contributions don't exist only bribery does? It doesn't sound like Shanedk is trying to link the two together, bribery and campaign contributions. i think that campaign contributions are a legal aspect of elections. It's still dishonest and unfair though or lining his pockets when ever a corporation gives a candidate millions of dollars to run for election of his or her intended office. that is what i think shanedk is talking about.

[billburns2]

@islamiscrap8888

Without proof it's nothing more than speculation.

Shane doesn't allow speculation from others - he demands proof.

There is no more to say on this topic

[islamiscrap8888]

@billburns2 did you not just read what i wrote?

[billburns2]

@islamiscrap8888

I sure did. If you want to ruminate on what does or doesn't affect elections and the nature of corruption per-se, that's one thing.

If you want to follow Shane's lead by throwing around accusations at a specific individual then you need PROOF. Speculation won't cut it.

[islamiscrap8888]

@billburns2 Affecting elections is not really relevant. The relevant issue is whether or not shanedk was talking about bribery or a company supporting a candidate when he used the phrase , "Lining his pockets."

Actually, why don't you take a look at your own video.

[billburns2]

@islamiscrap8888

I'll let you know when I want your opinion on which part of my video is relevant thanks.

I think you'd be more comfortable in the shanedk fan club - raise the double standard and shout LIAR.

[malignantpoodle]

Heh, Shane is so ignorant about so many things. He was trying to explain that the Clinton surplus was a myth because the national debt was 6 trillion dollars.

When I stated that Clinton balanced the budget and that there ended up being a budget surplus (i.e. no deficit spending) he said, "NO THERE WAS A 6 TRILLION DOLLAR DEBT ANYONE CAN LOOK IT UP"... along with the "LIAR" and other stuff.

Bottom line; he doesn't know the difference between debt and deficit.

[ninjacatmagic]

I agree with Shanedk on politics....But he is a douchebag.....As soon as you throw a fact that does not agree with what he is saying.....Or if you give a direct quote given by him that makes him out to be the douchebag he is....He calls you a LIAR (Always in all caps, ha/ha...) Or that you took him out of context......He once told me that 3 dictionaries, one of which was the Oxford English Dictionary!!!, were wrong because they didn't agree with HIS definition....Ha/ha...What a tool!.....

[Nihm420]

Heh.

I was "debating" shanedk... he was trying to convince me that if a 3rd world person had a choice between starving or a sweatshop job, that if they chose sweatshop, that was a "voluntary choice"... Calling me names for not agreeing with him.

I told him the defining feature of coercion was that you have no choice AND that his Aspergers was showing - he banned me for it.

I should have offered him some Shea butter for his tender, chaffed butthole...

[zEropoint68]

shanedk just made me cry for not liking Ron Paul. I hope he feels like a man, now.

[ZangaroZen]

Further to my post 2 hours, just got blocked by ShaneDK because I noted that bigotry includes "stubborn and complete intolerance of any creed, belief, or opinion that differs from one's own" and so many of his replies consisting of insults are violations of his channel rules 5 and 6. He replied it's a violation to apply his rules to himself (something to that effect). WARNING #2 (WARNING #1 regarding non-medical service in non-life threatening/non-legal cases). WARNING #3 he made up. What a wimp

[ZangaroZen]

Yup that's Shane in a nutshell. Declaring his opinion as fact and spewing insults to anyone that even raises a question. What a pathetic debating weakling Shane is.

[StatelessLiberty]

Awesome thumbnail.

[leopoldvonhabsburg]

If it's invalid... all of science is invalid and THE ENTIRE SPACE-TIME CONTINUUM WILL UNRAVEL!

This guy's a stitch!

[iseeallforme]

@louiethegreater Amen to that. He doesn't even know the difference between pure criticism of his inaccuracy and libel.