PS: What do I believe in? I will believe absolutely anything at all, but on one condition, you have to be able to prove it.
Watch my video "How the Quran led me from darkness" - it gives my true life story about the kind of crap one can end up believing if you accept things as truth without them first being proven to you.
The Quran is vague. People interpret it for what it appears to mean and then when the meaning changes they change their interpretation. What's miraculous about that?
Science books are not mostly wrong, they are mostly right. The core science is very solid, the new science is more speculative and the books change to reflect new discoveries.
The Quran cannot change, so it's only the interpretation that changes - why didn't god know this would happen and make the words more obvious?
@TheRationalizer maybe it's true of what you have mentioned but have you noticed that the Quran is actually giving detailed information about so many things and not just detailed but also as in some verse there are very unique timing detailed information
but in the other books their science is not detailed at all not most of if is incorrect, also information that they give does not make any sense, by the way what do you believe in?
In his book "The developing human" the Quran is mentioned in a section "Historical gleanings" along with Newton, Hindu scripture, Hippocrates, Galen, Aristotle, da Vinci, de Graaf, Malpighi, Hamm, Leeuenheok, Wolff, Spallanzani, Saint Hilaire, von Baer, Schleiden, Schwann, Wilhelm His, Franklin Mall, Wilhelm Roux, Hans Spemann, Edwards, Steptoe, Darwin, Mendel...
There are more, is the message getting through? The Quran is just one in a long list of "historical gleanings"
I know what he said 23 years ago, but I also know what he said to me in an email last year. He did NOT become a Muslim, he has a special "with Islamic additions" edition of his book available in Muslim countries but not in the rest of the world, and his book (which I own a copy of) shows how other civilisations believed similar things and also mentions a misconception in the Quran that humans are created by mixing male/female liquids.
@TheRationalizer Embryology and the Qur'an Moore has written on "references to embryology in the Qur'an", for instance, in an article for The Journal of the Islamic Medical Association, Vol. 18, Jan-June 1986, pp. 15-16.
@TheRationalizer go to this website and you will hear him saying the complete opposite from what you are saying mustaqeem . wordpress . com / 2008 / 02 / 18 / keith - moore - on - embryology - in - the - quran /
@TheRationalizer some of the information in the Quran, may have been known to them before the verse of the Quran was revealed...and the majority were not known at all, for example maybe the water not mixing between the rivier and the ocean or seas...as if there is a barier between them, and some as the deatailed developments of a baby in a mother's womb was not known to them, and guess what that info was proven was correct recently with the advanced technology
Surely you are being deceived and also deceiving others by misinterpreting the truths.
delamu09 9 months ago
@mhassan201
PS: What do I believe in? I will believe absolutely anything at all, but on one condition, you have to be able to prove it.
Watch my video "How the Quran led me from darkness" - it gives my true life story about the kind of crap one can end up believing if you accept things as truth without them first being proven to you.
TheRationalizer 1 year ago
@mhassan201
The Quran is vague. People interpret it for what it appears to mean and then when the meaning changes they change their interpretation. What's miraculous about that?
Science books are not mostly wrong, they are mostly right. The core science is very solid, the new science is more speculative and the books change to reflect new discoveries.
The Quran cannot change, so it's only the interpretation that changes - why didn't god know this would happen and make the words more obvious?
TheRationalizer 1 year ago
@TheRationalizer maybe it's true of what you have mentioned but have you noticed that the Quran is actually giving detailed information about so many things and not just detailed but also as in some verse there are very unique timing detailed information
but in the other books their science is not detailed at all not most of if is incorrect, also information that they give does not make any sense, by the way what do you believe in?
mhassan201 1 year ago
@mhassan201
In his book "The developing human" the Quran is mentioned in a section "Historical gleanings" along with Newton, Hindu scripture, Hippocrates, Galen, Aristotle, da Vinci, de Graaf, Malpighi, Hamm, Leeuenheok, Wolff, Spallanzani, Saint Hilaire, von Baer, Schleiden, Schwann, Wilhelm His, Franklin Mall, Wilhelm Roux, Hans Spemann, Edwards, Steptoe, Darwin, Mendel...
There are more, is the message getting through? The Quran is just one in a long list of "historical gleanings"
TheRationalizer 1 year ago
@mhassan201
I know what he said 23 years ago, but I also know what he said to me in an email last year. He did NOT become a Muslim, he has a special "with Islamic additions" edition of his book available in Muslim countries but not in the rest of the world, and his book (which I own a copy of) shows how other civilisations believed similar things and also mentions a misconception in the Quran that humans are created by mixing male/female liquids.
Those are the facts.
TheRationalizer 1 year ago
@TheRationalizer Embryology and the Qur'an Moore has written on "references to embryology in the Qur'an", for instance, in an article for The Journal of the Islamic Medical Association, Vol. 18, Jan-June 1986, pp. 15-16.
135-dr-keith-moore-confirms-embryology-in-quran
quranandscience . com
mhassan201 1 year ago
@TheRationalizer go to this website and you will hear him saying the complete opposite from what you are saying mustaqeem . wordpress . com / 2008 / 02 / 18 / keith - moore - on - embryology - in - the - quran /
mhassan201 1 year ago
@mhassan201
Dr Keith Moore made those embryology claims.
1: He had no conviction in his claim as he did NOT become a Muslim.
2: The book he coauthored on the subject has a special edition only available in places like Saudi Arabia.
3: The book available to the rest of the world shows how all of the stages written in the Quran were already believed by others.
4: In his book he even interprets one verse using its true meaning, which is scientifically incorrect.
You have been duped mate.
TheRationalizer 1 year ago
@TheRationalizer some of the information in the Quran, may have been known to them before the verse of the Quran was revealed...and the majority were not known at all, for example maybe the water not mixing between the rivier and the ocean or seas...as if there is a barier between them, and some as the deatailed developments of a baby in a mother's womb was not known to them, and guess what that info was proven was correct recently with the advanced technology
mhassan201 1 year ago