Global Warming Test
Uploader Comments (crazationsJr)
Top Comments
-
Apparently, cub production was higher in the latter period, but fewer cubs survived beyond the first 6 months of life. Parallel with declining survival, skull measurements suggested that COYs captured from 1990 to 2006 were smaller than those captured before 1990. Similarly, both skull measurements and body weights suggested that adult males captured from 1990 to 2006 were smaller than those captured before 1990.
-
The lower survival of COYs was corroborated by a comparison of the number of COYs per adult female for periods before (1967--89) and after (1990--2006) the winter of 1989--90, when warming temperatures and altered atmospheric circulation caused an abrupt change in sea ice conditions in the Arctic basin.
All Comments (17)
-
wtf? This Is All You Posted Jen? Its Boring :P
Get Better Ones.....
Mehh Marnn x
-
when he glacier falls into the ocean, thats when the water level rises. Not when the iceberg melts on water. try measuring before you put ice and after.
-
There are two things this experiment fails to demonstrate:
1) It's not just about icebergs melting. It's about glaciers (ice on land) melting. That will most definitely raise the water level.
2) Fresh water icebergs melting en masse atop salt water makes for serious consequences in terms of natural ocean flows. Salt water is denser than fresh water, and if fresh water melts on top of salt water, the fresh water will push salt water flows down and change ocean flows dramatically.
-
Well done! 5*
I can't wait for the next (coming our way soon) experiment!
Mairin
-
Totally off any regular values, what are you talking about here? 1 ft of galcier is 100ft of water where? Are you talking on squares or cubics?
-
Go look up what polar ice on a glacier is made from
1ft of polar ice = 100ft of regular snow/water
-
exvcellent experiment....and very well made video crazations jr....crazation snr....is very proud i bet...5****s subed
-
Only thing this person here has forgotten is that most of the ice thougt to cause the rising sea levels is not in the ocean, but on Greenland and Antarctica. On the other hand there are fluctuations in the temperature that could occure as a natural phenomenon, and are in no way caused by mankind, + putting poison into the Atmosphere surely will not be good for anything. But i got a good idea: Stop bringing down the forrests on this planet, exchanging them with tared roads.
-
Lol :) You cannot compress water... Don't believe me? Fill one 8cyl. engines cylinder all with water and leave the others clean. Then try to start it. I tell you, it will not move a bit :)
-
Accualy i was wrong, it takes 100ft of ice to make 1ft of glacier ice so when that 1ft melts it equals 100ft of regular compacted ice/water
ok what they write about the sea level is alarmist rubbish. What worries me are the effects on the fish stocks and animals there, especially the bears.....they want peace too!
nice one crazationsjr 5*
Mairinohailche 3 years ago 3
I really agree with u that is why I made this film, my film did prove that the sea levels will stay the same though, 10 years ago there was 5,000 polar bears and 2day there r over 25,000 and they can swim over 200 miles a day, so it sounds like there doing fine!
crazationsJr 3 years ago