Anarchism doesn't necessarily mean chaos: Non-coersive union and secession on all levels.
Uploader Comments (circlecityrabbit2004)
Top Comments
-
Anarchism from a political or social ideological perspective has absolutely nothing to do with chaos, disorder, or violence. Just wanted to point that out. You're on the right track though.
Video Responses
All Comments (80)
-
nice flag
-
Nice video, but what's with the racism in the background?
-
Anarchy ; society without being ruled
If you think you have Liberty under rule you are a dick
If you think that Liberty is chaos you are too much of a dick for words to begin to describe
-
@SocialAnarchism ''nothing to do withe chaos'' anarchy hase EVERYTHING to do withe ''the ends justify the means'' even if its withe chaos. thats what separates it from the hippy ideolegy
-
@ThePintsizeslasher anarchys great it works for somalia hell yeah ive got about 2000 rounds of 7.62 and a nice sks and i attended that good old government infantry school lets do this shit
-
@DissidentDescendant agreed all the way. I fly the black flag over my house, the flag of Anarchy
-
ANARCHY REIGNS
-
Anacrhism means with out rulers or authoritatian figure,there is no anarchist ideology that supports chaos you said it doesn't have to mean chaos it doesn't at all and also not having to work for a boss or some one else who would make money without actually working (capatilism)
-
if you dont work you dont eat :D
Anarchist here: Non-coercive govt is exactly what I'm for. Unlimited individual secession will produce voluntary social contracts/for-profit firms that will be inherently less violent than the state, and connected to directly to the people's needs through the gauges of prices, profits and losses through competition for constituents/customers. Voluntary businesses/voluntary collectives can meet all social needs in a more efficient manner than coercive states ever can.
Deo Vindice.
ThePintsizeslasher 2 years ago 4
Very well said, my sentiments exactely.
I used to be someone that thought anarchy simply meant chaos due to the lack of government, but it can also mean a government that doesn't force itself upon the people. I think it would definitely work better than the mandatory involvement in the state that we have now.
circlecityrabbit2004 2 years ago
only fortunatly this were i disagree with you
MoroccoPatriot 2 years ago
Lol hey disagreeing is a big part of democracy right
circlecityrabbit2004 2 years ago