excavator vs. elevator
Top Comments
All Comments (53)
-
@borderraven hehe :D you have an excellent point however, the majority of the dwelling exterior was corrigated steel/metal. Burning the house in this case would use far 'more' energy as it has simply been wasted in the sky. They chose a suitable method, the owner is generally charged an hourly rate; which can be cost effective in this building type. The added benefit is actually recycling the torn material to compensate the demolition cost and removal. :D peace out
-
@bytmeh 1
-
@borderraven I think the most efficient way is for your mother to eat it, just like she does with everything else :D
-
@PaulPreddy umm...they did burn it, just had to be sure the bonfire didn't fall over while roasting the marshmellows
-
Dude, humans rule!
-
@GeorgeVeld, Big boom is better YouTube.
-
@vivitar45, I agree it would take less energy to light it on fire and clean up afterwards, that to spend fuel and operator time tearing it down. Fire would have burn the wood, leaving carbon and metal, more efficient than mechanical tear down.
-
wudnt it have been easier to burn the dam thing down seemign it;s mainy made of wood?
-
"Watch all the way to the end!" Yeah, fuck that.
-
i just burn it down be easyer
In Philly one day an excavator crew came in a did a clean job of taking down an old house. Pretty quick too. Turns out the company that sent them gave them the wrong address! The guy cam home from work like WTF????
wingmanalive 7 months ago 17
I dont think he caught that love - more like it caught him...
newjcb123uk 1 year ago 6