Chomsky vs Bolkestein : Dutch Debate

Extraits du debat entre Chomsky et Bolkestein, à propos du bouquin "Manufacturing Consent" (1988).

Plus d'infos :
http://souk-fares.blogspot.com/2007/08/de-la-thorie-du-complot-en-guise.html


.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Manufacturing
• Consent
• Media
• Chomsky
• Bolkestein

[allthings509]

Run away neocon loser.

This is the reason these moron neocons are afraid of debate and need constant chaos and war, because they cannot possibly win any debate, not on any point. Dirty stupid cowards.

[jeremybalfe]

Wow, I think this Bolkestein clowned got owned by Chomsky even worse than Richard Perle was.

[DeweyZinnChomskyFisk]

i have the full interview on my computer. i must've either downloaded it from iSoHunt or ThePirateBay. possibly Demonoid but probably not

[SUpersaiyajinjerkbag]

IS there a full debate?

[Trinivalts]

I loved what he said about conspiracy theories, so many people dismiss strong points with this booo phrase these days.

[littleflags]

anyone know where i can find the FULL debate? i would love to watch it in it's entirety but can't find it anywhere!

[polymath7]

That's a bold statement. The Perle debate is likely the most thorougoing intellectual trouncing I have ever seen.

If you ever hear someone say they're skepical that any public debate is ever completely one-sided, that's the example to cite to disabuse them. Not halfway through, Perle stammers "I..I have no answer to that...". Chomsky just sodomizes, decapitates, and skullfucks him from every conceivable angle.

Then again, Bolkestein actually seems to shit himself and run for the crapper.

[HumaninSeoul]

"Intellectual Intimidation"

Translation: He trying to win the debate by being smarter than me, [insert tears here]

[henkiskwaad]

In a sense this is what Stalinism amounts to - Chomsky's insisting that all that matters is the absence of coercive capital. "We must replace, condemn, and - well, live by capitalism." The original comrades were far more human - they went for themselves, rallied people to action, believed in the power of the proletariat subjectively - they believed in the good. They didn't care if they needed to use words, money or arms - but then, they had an incredibly weak opponent in the spineless Czar.

[henkiskwaad]

@allthings509 They are too busy making money. They could only win by being honest and that would take too much time. Power is in organization, not in statement of facts. Organization is a time consuming occupation and also results in a much different view of reality - a subjective, involved one (I try to do the best I can for myself and those who I know enough to matter to me emotionally). Chomsky holds an emotionally objective and intellectually passive view; the negative valuation of reality.