2. Prof. Ian Plimer on climate change debate and his new book Heaven & Earth

http://2gb.com/index2.php?option=com_newsmanager&task=view&id=3331
http://www.angusrobertson.com.au/book/heaven-and-earth-global-warming-the-mis...
http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2008/s2554129.htm
http://longrangeweather.com/images/GTEMPS.gif
"What is fundament to the argument -- if we just take the last 2000 years. The planet was hot in Roman and Greek times. Then it cooled in the dark ages, then it warmed in the medieval warmth. Then it cooled in the little ice ages, and we are now, we've just come out of the little ice age. Is it any wonder that the planet has warmed up?" -- Prof. Ian Plimer

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• ian
• plimer
• prof
• climate
• change
• al
• gore
• lateline
• tony
• jones

[pseudotruth]

Jerepah

'Exactly what science is that?'

There is clearly a disconnect between myth and reality. There is only one kind of science. It is objective, peer-reviewed and published in a web of science journal

Everything else is irrelevant. That means that your beloved Plimer's claims [even if they weren't bogus & plagiarised] would be irrelevant. As indeed are websites like McFraudit; μWatts; Junkscience etc. Additionally the WaPo; Fox News; CNN; Glenn Beck; Energy & Environment are all irrelevant

[jerepah]

Quote: 'More than 31,000 scientists from across the United States including more than 9,000 Ph.Ds from the fields of climatology, atmospheric science, earth science, and hydrology signed a petition rejecting manmade global warming as a 'scientific fraud'. This shattered the hopes of the so-called consensus that the mainstream [corporate-owned] media have been pushing for years, that every scientist on earth believed that manmade global warming was a fact.'

See aim org or pt.14 Fall of Repub

[pseudotruth]

It looks like Plimer is guilty of plagiarism.

Google

Ian Plimer is a con artist

Plimer the plagiarist

[jerepah]

Better still, have the intestinal fortitude (aka "guts") to watch Pts. 1, 2, 3 of Fall of The Republic which I've just uploaded, and comment? I wait with bated breath. Also what did you make of the Rauni Kilde video (current top of my 'favs')? Is she right? Any validity in what she says?

[pseudotruth]

jerepah

I note no support for Plimer who managed to make exactly the same errors as Ferdinand Engelbeen, but much later! And yet Plimer does not cite Engelbeen! Sounds like plagiarism to me!

Don't forget the catalogue of Plimer's climate tripe.

Google

Ian Plimer Heaven + Earth checking the claims Enting

I'm not interested in videos. I'm interested in the science and ensuring that deceivers get the recognition they deserve.

[jerepah]

"I'm not interested in videos." How convenient. "I'm interested in the science." Exactly what science is that? In the "Al Gore Slammed By Congress!" video above, Louisiana Senator Steve Scalise makes the valid point (at 1:55) that once Al's carbon trading scheme kicks in it'll cost millions of Americans their jobs which will go to China and India, and then that's where the carbon will continue to be emitted. Seems you're fully in favour of the demise of the American Empire? Who do you represent?

[chotaboy66]

Why do you need to read other peoples comments cant you logically think for yourself or are you a group thinker and please where is the overwhelming support in the literature.

The legitimate literature that is overwhelming actually dose not support man made global warming its only political lies and twisted media that portrays this to people that dont bother to question the motives of all involved. There is no one to blame except the people themselves for not questioning there own reality.

[nationofjoe]

ok reading your other comments have led me to conclude that you're just joking around.

[nationofjoe]

Paranoia incarnate. Whenever you disagree with something that is overwhelmingly supported by the scientific literature do you blame the NWO as well?

[mryellow123]

That's fine, you're very caught up on "I know the truth".

This is a mistake many people seem to make, they get more caught up in how cool it is to be "different" and to know the "truth", then keeping their mind.

[chotaboy66]

My final comment.

You cant be serious Your comment dose not make any logical sense.

Quote from the beginning of this clip.

Q;THis is fundamental to your whole argument isn't.

A;No it isn't ,What is fundamental

What planet are you from or are you some kind of spook here to discredit the factual evidence that throws the whole global warming conspiracy THEORY out the door with nothing more than your claim you think he's a book scammer,.

You sir are delusional & I'm sorry I cant help you.

[mryellow123]

Why ridicule him?

Maybe cause he's an obvious book scammer?

If he answered ***ONE*** question in the whole interview then maybe I wouldn't consider him to be a douche.

[chotaboy66]

Thats why people buy newspapers that generally get discarded in the rubbish bin as these information scorces are trully missleading and have little to no credit other than the sports page.

[chotaboy66]

You seem to think this illusion is an argument now are you feeling ok.

I offer freindship and knowledge and your eyes close in fear of reality ,Im not here for an arguement Im here to try to figure out why you ridicule this man with out even reading or researching his litrature ,on this basis one would not even conceive a hostile attack on this man's character or his sources.

[mryellow123]

It's a simple formula for making money used by many authors. All it takes is no conscious or morals and the rest is easy.

[mryellow123]

Stopped reading at "my friend".

His whole arguement is a constructed load of bullshit designed to be controversial to sell his book. His miss-quoting of sources has been pointed out by many of the sources themselves.

He's a book scammer. Simple.

Go buy "The Secret" or "DaVinci Code" you'll enjoy them lol.