Purpose of the 9/11 Attacks

I think others should try and report this to by posting links as facebook statuses, or showing friends, etc.

When the neo-cons tell us that 9/11 happened as a result of our freedoms and our way of life and that they want to kill us because we don't conform to their beliefs, we're not Muslim like they are, because they want to create a one world Islamic state, and go out of their way to empower them, elevate them into a threat 10 times worse than they really are and give them superhuman powers that they don't have, it should be obvious by now that they just want all that to be the truth.

9/11 attack was wrong,

Excellent video!

Your stupid!

let this stupid wanna be a sheihk tell us the purpose of wtc buliding 7 hey sheihk why did buildig 7 fall on its own oh my mistake ur no sheihk ur just an american faggot trying to cover up on the 9/11 this is a fake document the 7th buliding carrys the c.i.a , us secrets an other shitt the only reason it fell is so that those business wat ever they do can damage the middle east without any one going agaist them cuz they would say that the muslims atack our shitt so they want to take revenge

What? English is the language we speak, not idiot....... continue watching fox news you brainless fool

what a muslim he calls him self a shiek they obivously paid millions for him to go aigast the truth hes not a muslim hes a trader they just want us to look bad and the american government to look innocent as victims so they would have the right to attack iraq and middle east countries but the truth is they only attacked iraq cuz saddam wanted the us to by thiere olis in iraqi currency usaly the US wants oil to be sold in US currency the want to use the 9/11 as an excuse they attack iraq for oil

The document that this dude treats as scripture is an alleged confession provided by an alleged suspect that had nothing but court appointed legal representation during the trial. Further, the alleged testimony was admittedly gathered in the absence of legal representation and it's entirely hearsay evidence. And yet this is all it takes to convince this dude that all the statements alleged to have been made by the defense are true and factual proof of guilt.. Talk about a kangaroo court!

911 is a murder investigation.. & yet, we're supposed 2 form our final beliefs & verdict about the motives of the alleged perpetrators of 911, as if they are now a known fact, purely because of ALLEGED hearsay evidence provided by one of the suspects?

In other words, because 1 of the suspects in the case that may or may not have been tortured, & who was not provided legal council, ALLEGEDLY provided an unprovable, unquestionable admission 2 1 of the other suspects, the matter is resolved???