Re: Texe Marrs: Part IV

My response to James White's videos (titled "Texe Marrs Part I, II, III, & IV") about Texe Marrs, the Don Wilkins incident on the Ankerberg debate, and my video about them.

I've received confused comments, so I must clarify for those who haven't seen my other videos on the Ankerberg-show-Wilkin's-losing-his-voice-incident: James White showed a clip from a different part of the debate that is SIMILAR TO what is described in Texe's article, and assumes (or wants you to assume) that it IS the event described in Texe's article (because if it was, then it would prove Texe was exaggerating).

The comments from White's deluded, blind, double-minded supporters never cease to amaze (or nauseate) me.
They've said I don't care about the truth, only my "agenda". I care INTENSELY about the truth. NOBODY has proven wrong the basic thesis of Texe Marrs' article. Their position is self-contradictory; Bible-believers by definition CAN'T LIE as intentially as is suggested by James White and his supporters, but new version advocates by definition are VERY likely to lie! After all, who was it that omitted "Thou shalt not bear false witness" from Romans 13:9??
IT WASN'T US!!!

Riplinger's response to James White's criticism of her book NewAgeBibleVersions:
www.av1611.org/kjv/ripwhit1.html

Category:

Education

Tags:

• James
• White
• Don
• Wilkins
• John
• Ankerberg
• debate
• lose
• voice
• Texe
• Marrs