Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Obama / Democrat healthcare plan is unconstitutional

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
6,319
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 20, 2009

This health care issue is a hallucinated right that is not a right, and is wrong per the constitution of the United States of America (USA).

Them thar Demicrats (Democrats) and President Obama are not challenged constitutionally on this issue because of President Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR 32nd President, elected to four terms). During the 1930s FDR had the Supreme Court rule his New Deal legislation as constitutional by exploiting the interstate commerce clause article 1, section 8, clause 3, of the U.S. Constitution.




Some background of this clause: After the American Revolution the law of the land was the Articles of Confederation. Under these articles the newly formed nation consisted of 13 states and one weak central government. States printed their own money, and assessed tariffs on goods / products shipped between state lines. The states soon came to realize the Articles were weak and ineffective causing them to send 55 delegates to Philadelphia in 1787 to make the articles stronger. Instead the delegates scrapped the Articles and wrote the Constitution.

In this new document to address the issue of commerce between the states, Article 1, Section 8, clause 3 was inserted. Remember now this was done to effect the smooth transition of business between the states, nothing to do with healthcare in any form. These delegates after the constitution was ratified went on to hold positions in the newly formed government. Here is a list of the government positions they held:

15 Senators
10 members of the House of Representatives
6 Cabinet posts
4 governors
3 Supreme Court Justices
2 Presidents
1 Federal Judge

If health care was part of the Constitution, then how come when these men held the above positions not a one called for the Federal government involvement in healthcare? To understand a law, one examines the intent of the authors / legislators. In an attempt to explain the Constitution to the states some members of the convention authored The Federalist Papers. No where in The Federalist Papers can healthcare be located. These men engaged in volumes of correspondence and once again no mention of health care.

The government of these here United States has no business injecting itself into healthcare and by the intent, actions, and behavior of the Founders, such a step is unconstitutional.

Principle author of The Declaration of Independence and third president of the United States, Thomas Jefferson once said,

"When a government is afraid of its people there is freedom, when people are afraid of their government there is tyranny."

The determination through this administration and Democrats in Congress total disregard for the Constitution and successfully defeating capitalism, have given us the tyranny President Jefferson warned us about.

It was Vladimir Lenin who said,

"The goal of socialism is communism."

NOTE: Please accept my apology in advance. I will delete any comments posted on this video not related to this video. There are too many trolls posting comments on my videos which have absolutely nothing to do with the topic of the video. May I suggest these trolls post their own videos to vent their opinions on topics not related to this video?

Propagandabuster propaganda buster Obama healthcare socialized medicine Democrats Congress constitution interstate commerce FDR comrade Lenin socialism socialist Pelosi

  • likes, 20 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (PropagandaBuster)

  • Pointless. This is not the commerce clause, this is the ability of Congress to levy taxes to provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States. Congress can increase taxes by 2.5%. That's perfectly Constitutional. And Congress can give you a 2.5% tax credit when you buy a product. That's also perfectly Constitutional.

    P.S. The reason they didn't think of health care was because it was 1789. No government of any nation really cared about their citizen's welfare, then..

  • @nafaidni - Correction: "The reason they didn't think of health care was because it was 1789" and they believed in individual responsibility. Today that is an alien concept.

  • This is a really useful video. I'm doing research on Article 1 Section 8 and it's nice to know the background information about what it was originally intended for.

  • @frodobaggins115: Thank you. I am happy to know this video helped.

  • You haven't talked to me in a while. Something wrong?

  • Nothing is wrong. I do not favor unconstitutional healthcare, and you do. What's to talk about when both our minds are made up? Shall we discuss another topic?

Video Responses

This video is a response to Healthcare - Don't tread on me
see all

All Comments (502)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • remember to keep the public seprate from the state, YOU are the public, we are the healthcare THEY meet the challange because they (STATE) imbodie US the federlist no 55 imboidies our freedom THAT is THEM THE RICH the congress are this RICH their propaganda fuels YOU, you sound lost in the riches of the congress keep us seprate from them then speak

  • my polisci says nothing about this clause in the 1930's. the first time this clause was talked about was in the case, Gibbons v. Ogden in 1824......was about intrastate and interstate travel.

  • @TheKnowBuddies Your analysis is incorrect, the decision of a Federal Court of Appeals does not apply everywhere within the United States (that's jurisdiction of the Supreme Court), but only within the district that ruled it unconstitutional. The ruling in one federal appellate district doesn't apply everywhere. Maybe you should learn more about constitutional law before spouting off...

  • I'm sorry I didn't realize providing our fellow Americans with healthcare was against the constitution, I guess I'd just become a republican and say to my fellow but poor american "FUCK 'EM" Ahh, GOD BLESS AMERICA INDEED *and its backwards way of analyzing society needs*

  • For the Governors of the 26 states involved in the Federal Court decision,

    Unconstitutional = Unconstitutional. (until and only if the decision is

    overturned can it be law)

    The lack of an injunction does NOT make the Obama Government Health Care Take Over constitutional.

    Governors, if you allow any taxpayer money to be spent, in your state, on the

    unconstitutional law, you should re-evaluate your oath of office.

    The decisions stands unless it be changed by the appeal process,not until.

  • Healthcare is not a right! We only have unalienable Rights. When these Rights are view through the prism of science (see my channel video), one will find they apply to all Life, from bacteria to humans, and Social systems, including Charles Darwin’s research; as in some Grand Unification principle for all Living-systems. Most understand the Laws of Nature trumps mortals in power; a new understanding of these Rights may help make this world a better place to live.

  • @BullCatification

    I agree. The draft was something that made people join unwillingly, but this is not the current way of things, the draft is not in action. I disagree with the concept of the draft (the idea being the nation owns you and can force you to do something).

    When I said "healthcare is a benefit of your job", I meant in the military. I do realize the inexactitude of both what I said and what I am saying now, because many are given the option of buying tricare, not tricare itself.

  • @axelasdf

    1. Actually, there is a thing called "Drafted" and I can assure you that it isn't willingly.

    2. It is a benefit of "Some" Jobs.

  • This guy is totally full of shit!

  • A judge in Florida on Mon became the second judge to declare Obama's healthcare reform law unconstitutional, in the biggest legal challenge yet to fed authority to enact the law. This Obama needs to GO... I have never seen a more lazy president in the White House. But he sure likes the party's I can't wait till hes' gone.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more