Re: WTC Tower 7: Examining Conspiricist Claims
Top Comments
All Comments (1,479)
-
Hmm.... Maybe 5WTC didn't collapse because it didnt have 40 stories of concrete and steel stacked on top of it.
-
that woman's vocals ruin the song. Had to mute it.
-
'To the friends of A&E.No university,research centers,technical journals, associations of engineers and architects believe the lies"
funny that LL YOU can do is to SPAM the names...WITHOUT providing ANY EVIDENCE...
so fagot third world engineer....Provide a link to some engineering report of this supposed gravitational collapse that contains the mass distribution information to show how it got around the conservation of momentum to come down so fast?
you seem to AVOID this
-
@1famekouby Check out the madrid skyscraper that burned for 24 hours and only crumbled a bit at the top.
The conspirators obviously think they had dumbed the people down enough to believe in movie fantasy along with the IQ reducing fluoride and vaccinations.
WRONG BOYS! LOL!
-
To the friends of A&E.No university,research centers,technical journals, associations of engineers and architects believe the lies and the demolition of the "A&E".The same in Asia,Oceania,Canada,Europe and South America.The list below is today.I have the link of all. Always find more on the internet.There evidence against the towers and WTC7.Only 0.001% of U.S.engineers are in A&E.Without the universities the A&E will never convince the U.S. Congress to reopen anything.



If anything, this video proves the conspiracy theory correct. The building is burning much more violently then WTC7, yet WTC7 collapsed symmetrically whereas this building stayed standing.
Therefore implying that additional "help" was needed for WTC7 to come down.
Why the hell would any person over 80 IQ think that a burning building not collapsing would corroborate a fire-based collapse theory?
1famekouby 3 weeks ago 4
The official story found it absolutely impossible to explain the complete collapse of the core columns, hence why it never has, and never wants to, because it is simply impossible to do that. It only ever described, an over exaggerated, previously and still currently considered impossible scenario, explaining a floor slip. It then only assumes this created a dominoe pancake effect, yet never proved how it is possible, or explained how all the core columns possibly severed, at every single floor
KungFriedChicken 1 month ago 2