Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Re: WTC Tower 7: Examining Conspiricist Claims

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
48,204
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 1, 2007

WTC 5 was a nine-story building that stood east of the North Tower (WTC 1). The building had two dozen tenants, with its fourth through ninth floors being occupied almost entirely by Morgan Stanley, Credit Suisse First Boston, and government agencies.
--
Apparently the evacuation of Building 5 began shortly after the North Tower was hit. The South Tower crash deposited some remains of Flight 175's hull on the roof of WTC 5, according to FEMA's Report.
--
WTC 5 was severely damaged by fallout from the destruction of the Towers. Large falling pieces of steel from the Towers' perimeter walls are the probable cause of the holes in the roof seen from above.
--
Serious fires raged through WTC 5 for hours. Despite the massive structural damage shown by the holes, and fires far more severe than those in WTC 1, 2, and 7, WTC 5 did not collapse.
--
WTC 5 was demolished as part of the clean-up of Ground Zero.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • If anything, this video proves the conspiracy theory correct. The building is burning much more violently then WTC7, yet WTC7 collapsed symmetrically whereas this building stayed standing.

    Therefore implying that additional "help" was needed for WTC7 to come down.

    Why the hell would any person over 80 IQ think that a burning building not collapsing would corroborate a fire-based collapse theory?

  • The official story found it absolutely impossible to explain the complete collapse of the core columns, hence why it never has, and never wants to, because it is simply impossible to do that. It only ever described, an over exaggerated, previously and still currently considered impossible scenario, explaining a floor slip. It then only assumes this created a dominoe pancake effect, yet never proved how it is possible, or explained how all the core columns possibly severed, at every single floor

see all

All Comments (1,479)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Hmm.... Maybe 5WTC didn't collapse because it didnt have 40 stories of concrete and steel stacked on top of it.

  • that woman's vocals ruin the song. Had to mute it.

  • @aczjb

    'To the friends of A&E.No university,research centers,technical journals, associations of engineers and architects believe the lies"

    funny that LL YOU can do is to SPAM the names...WITHOUT providing ANY EVIDENCE...

    so fagot third world engineer....Provide a link to some engineering report of this supposed gravitational collapse that contains the mass distribution information to show how it got around the conservation of momentum to come down so fast?

    you seem to AVOID this

  • @1famekouby Check out the madrid skyscraper that burned for 24 hours and only crumbled a bit at the top.

    The conspirators obviously think they had dumbed the people down enough to believe in movie fantasy along with the IQ reducing fluoride and vaccinations.

    WRONG BOYS! LOL!

  • To the friends of A&E.No university,research centers,technical journals, associations of engineers and architects believe the lies and the demolition of the "A&E".The same in Asia,Oceania,Canada,Europe and South America.The list below is today.I have the link of all. Always find more on the internet.There evidence against the towers and WTC7.Only 0.001% of U.S.engineers are in A&E.Without the universities the A&E will never convince the U.S. Congress to reopen anything.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more