Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Obama to announce new Afghan plans

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
1,408
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 16, 2009

The White House is expected to announce its new redrawn strategy for the war in Afghanistan this week, said US Defense officials.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (48)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Oh I totally agree that its bullshit and an infringement on our rights, but we'll never see its practical application. The general population in America isnt that stupid and useless yet. My argument on that is there are much more pressing matters to attend to. Its worrying however and does remind me of a certain failed republic of the past. Ancient Rome anyone? Like I said though, PD51 is the exact reason the 2nd amendment was penned into the bill of rights, protection from a corrupt government.

  • The government has rendered treason unprosecutable. THe 2,700 murder victims will never be righted. Nationhood is a mere abstraction in the hands of personalities purchasable by money or subject to their wilingness to be the next persons to slam planes into world trade centers or wield extraordinary weaponry. They will hire lawyers to provide social lubricant, this will be seen as increasingly irrelevant however. Bullies will simply predominate by gradation.

  • doesnt matter if PD-51 will be put in motion. the point is that it shouldnt exist. the fact that obama wont do anything about all this unconstitutional legislation tells me everything i need to know. that and the fact that he voted yes on FISA right after bashing bush for warrantless spying.

  • Congress never declared war, nor did they take any actions against it (which they could). If I'm not mistaken congress hasn't made a declaration of war since WWI... as they considered America at war when japan attacked pearl harbor.

    I'm merely stating that the war isn't unconstitutional. Iraq is bullshit, but legal, Afganistan is where we should be, and only there, the Taliban attacked the American people and the government has the responsibility to protect us, which means war on Al Queda.

  • Please... please... visit my site the playlists "the evil that men do- amerika" and "US in trouble"... there is too much to write... your choice good luck.

  • Currently those that are constitutionalists are considered terrorists as well as supporters for Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin and Bob Barr (all presidential candidates 2008) even those that belong to Campaign for liberty. When will you wake up and see our aweful situation? Our Constitution hangs by a thread,will you wait to see it cut? If you want to live under tyranny go ahead. I choose to remain free and defend my brothers all who believe in liberty even if my blood is shed... never surrender never.

  • We are on the brink of destruction from within... economically, politically and socially... there are at least 20 states clamoring to reinstate states right... there will be many tax protests... even worse than the anti-war ones. There will be a time when you will have to chose... save the Constitution or fight to destroy it.

  • Article I - The Legislative Branch

    Section 8 - Powers of Congress

    "The Congress shall ...

    To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;"

    Congress is the only one that can declare war... that was for a reason... so we would not get into wars so easily... how many men have died, father and sons (now women too) have been taken needlessly? Why do you think we are such a divided nation?

  • PD-51 won't ever be enacted, there are too many armed Americans that won't give up their freedoms. However PD-51 does prove the importance of the second amendment. Americans don't have the right to keep weapons because of culture, or for food, or anything like that. Its because when the time comes to overthrow the government because of corruption the people will be armed and ready. I'm not arguing for or against a party, I'm a registered independent, but I am arguing for the constitution.

  • EO's have been around alot longer than Clinton, Washington himself gave a few, as did Lincoln, (Emancipation Proclamation?) EO's are subject to the judicial branch review, and can be declared unconstitutional. But no, I'm not talking about EO's.

    Article 2, Section 2: "The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States;"

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more