JAS 39 vs. JSF 35

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
40,087
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 9, 2008

One off these fighter are gone be the Royal Norwegian Air force next fighter jet.
IT HAS BEEN DESIDED: WINNER: JSF

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • @homboy107

    It's kind of funny that you would say that, considering that the JSF was announced as the "Ground attack plane, of the century", not really a fighter. Also Lockheed Martin altered the specifications for a 5:th generation fighter so that the JSF could fit into that category.

    so in my oppinion:

    a) norway should have choosen JAS 39 Gripen

    b) also they shouldn't have lied by saying the Gripen is more expensive. they should have told the norwegian people they just wanted protection.

  • Jas will fuckin rape that shit plane.

see all

All Comments (525)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @wassupMannn Indeed it was.

  • @terrygand These generation designations are just stupid. they are made by americans to make their own planes sound better, and sell better. No other reason.

  • @strv90 Norway should have bought planes from people with proper reliable technology, made to operate in the arctic conditions of our part of the world. I know I'm gonna get flamed for this, but norway should have bough MiG's.

  • @terrygand Jas will gonna get rape by JSF

  • @easton1337 hahaha

  • F-16 is more than 20 years old. It was a very good Fighter ( my friend knew an Israeli Pilot), however, Jas 39 is the next generation; you cannot compare the two.

  • Bad decision Norway... very bad..

  • @IntronDepot1 The Israelis use the F-16 as a bomber. Their air-air capability comes from their F-15's.

    Greece and Turkey are feared due to their pure numbers.

    And I must correct my previous statement: the F-16 WAS a poor fighter. However, I stick to my statement that the Viggen was a supperior fighter to the F-16 until the Viggen was pulled from service.

  • @hogge87 ....which is ridiculously small. Dude, quit talkin, your brain is mush.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more