JAS 39 vs. JSF 35
Top Comments
All Comments (525)
-
@wassupMannn Indeed it was.
-
@terrygand These generation designations are just stupid. they are made by americans to make their own planes sound better, and sell better. No other reason.
-
@strv90 Norway should have bought planes from people with proper reliable technology, made to operate in the arctic conditions of our part of the world. I know I'm gonna get flamed for this, but norway should have bough MiG's.
-
@terrygand Jas will gonna get rape by JSF
-
@easton1337 hahaha
-
F-16 is more than 20 years old. It was a very good Fighter ( my friend knew an Israeli Pilot), however, Jas 39 is the next generation; you cannot compare the two.
-
Bad decision Norway... very bad..
-
@IntronDepot1 The Israelis use the F-16 as a bomber. Their air-air capability comes from their F-15's.
Greece and Turkey are feared due to their pure numbers.
And I must correct my previous statement: the F-16 WAS a poor fighter. However, I stick to my statement that the Viggen was a supperior fighter to the F-16 until the Viggen was pulled from service.
-
@hogge87 ....which is ridiculously small. Dude, quit talkin, your brain is mush.
@homboy107
It's kind of funny that you would say that, considering that the JSF was announced as the "Ground attack plane, of the century", not really a fighter. Also Lockheed Martin altered the specifications for a 5:th generation fighter so that the JSF could fit into that category.
so in my oppinion:
a) norway should have choosen JAS 39 Gripen
b) also they shouldn't have lied by saying the Gripen is more expensive. they should have told the norwegian people they just wanted protection.
strv90 8 months ago 7
Jas will fuckin rape that shit plane.
easton1337 11 months ago 6