NH's Diebold Accuvote optical scanners were re-approved for use in 2006 by the Ballot Law Commission. Four out of five political appointees voted to approve the machines after they heard four hours of testimony from citizens against the approval. Citizens came bearing scientific reports, like the VSTAAB report, a scientific study done on the technology by a group of experts at U Cal Berkeley and released on Valentines Day 2006.
The Commission made their discretionary decision applying no criteria for ensuring the technology they were approving would secure the purity of the vote count.
This video shows you what the Commission learned and their vote and rationale for approving the technology.
What the fuck is wrong with this country, I don't think I am going to wait for the election, I am GETTING THE FUCK OUT OF THIS PIECE OF SHIT UNITED STATES OF FASCISM.
ncqm98 4 years ago
What would it take? 10 or 20 minutes? But now someone has to pay $60,000 - who's going to do that? Why should they when it's already been shown in small communities that the count was invalid? Some of these people here should do some jail time for their gross irresponsibilities!
People of New Hampshire - you have to demand it.
cheesphht 4 years ago
Another one of them says that they can hand count the ballots but were they instructed to? Were they told that they even could? I would think that in the small town where they (the machines) were caught red handed they could have done that quite easily.
cheesphht 4 years ago
One guy seems to actually be able to read a report and say - wait a minute here! Problems everywhere they go? I vote no. What is wrong with these other guys? One of them even says that the voting will be in chaos if they don't have these machines? Is he dyslexic? What do they have now?
An invalid election.
cheesphht 4 years ago
Some of them allegedly have criminal backgrounds...too lazy to Google right now.
mbear14 4 years ago
Everyone - Send an email to Lou Dobbs at CNN demanding he cover the voting fraud in NH !!! One segment where he demonstrates another Diebold machine hacking in one minute is found elsewhere on YouTube. LOU DOBBS IS THE ONLY LIKELY ONE IN THE MEDIA TO PAY ATTENTION.
A manual recount is easy because the machines are scanners, so there is paper to count.
YouTube Power! SEND THEM EMAILS OUT..
sjdesilets 4 years ago
This is interesting. On the basis of the report provided, the decision to use the Diebold machines is clearly a bad one.
There either had to be significant pressure put on these individuals or they are in someone's pocket.
Probably not too difficult to do some investigation on who these people are friends with or work/have worked with.
sixfourwm 4 years ago
Sad, sad day for voters!
Maymet 4 years ago