JNU students clash over Naxal attack

The clash took place between those students against and those for the government action against Maoists.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• jnu
• clash
• jawaharlal
• nehru
• university
• student
• students
• fight
• cnn
• ibn
• news
• india

[anu123km]

kill naxals...start the crusade from JNU............

[amithbn]

@anu123km Is violence bad? Absolutely. But whom should you be condemning? The aggressor or the one who is standing up to the aggressor? If you were to compare these cycles of violence, the state has completely lost it's morality, created a genocide like situation, trying to cleanse a whole community to satisfy certain MoUs. You can go on condemning the resistive violence by Maoists, but first begin with the state violence if you don't want to be hypocritical.

[qwertyui66771]

@anu123km the motherfuckers of JNU will sell india one day due to such ideology.

[qwertyui66771]

@amithbn dont give shit.if communist shits are too mush concerned about the place why didnt it made roadway in place of providing arms.i know the situation of midinapur,and the way people live there.in bengal every party of their own goons whick is known as maoist.do u think they know about any ideology.they are goons of the govt against opposition and police.

[qwertyui66771]

if the country divide again ,role of JNU will be significant .motherfuckers dont have anything to do except brahmanwad-dalitwad and anti national activities.they will sell country if they have to.

[amithbn]

@anu123km The propaganda tools of the government, sadly the right wing media unwilling to question has largely reported an unbalanced view of this situation. People are indoctrinated by the lies. Ready to jump on the resisting poor rather than a government that has created conditions of a genocide. Wake up!!

[amithbn]

@anu123km There are a whole bandwidth of movements. There have been non-violent movements going on from years. But the government has completely ignored it. By ignoring non-violent movements, it is the government that privileges violent movements. Again, the fault lies at the hand of the government. It has failed to recognize the various different resistance movements and clubbed all of them under the extreme Moaist movement.

[amithbn]

@anu123km Now put yourself in the place of these tribals. Your village is suddenly attacked by the police, raping, looting and killing your people. Wouldn't you resist the attacks which is even "legal"? This situation is not binary, i.e Maoists on one side and the government on the other. There are a range of people.Maoists being the extreme end of the resistive movement. Which is being increasingly purchased by the other tribals because of the incredible injustice unleashed by the state.

[amithbn]

@anu123km Good question. So open up your mind a little bit now to process what is to follow. There are millions of tribal people who are in abject conditions, out of the radar of the government, where there is absolutely no basic amenities even. These people however also happen to also be in a place that is rich in minerals. The government signs MoUs with mining companies and these people need to be moved. They don't agree. The government starts attacking with strategic hamletting and police.

[anu123km]

@amithbn But you support naxals??? Strange...hmmm.....you are deluded and totally confused. Get a life.

[amithbn]

@anu123km Because I am a citizen of civil society. I don't support regimes that murder people, burn their homes, rape their women. As the govt. of India puts it, sanitize the area - the language of genocide. We will be called upon, as Ms Roy says, one day to answer for our sins like the Germans were!