Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Brilliant Greenpeace video on Chernobyl

Greenpeace channel: http://www.youtube.com/gree... "20 years ago: Chernobyl" is a fast moving short film - like a music video - about the Chernobyl disaster and Greenpeace anti-nuke campaign. Film...  
 
Customize

More From: gpvideo

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
1,181 ratings
Sign in to rate
327,849 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (1,907)   Options

Loading...
arthurkitchen (3 days ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
Greenpeace and all of the enviroidiots need to just fuck off and get a clue.
andrzejnher4eva (1 day ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
i think its you who should fuck up and die.
peacefully i hope and God forbid not like how those many people affected by chernobyl died and are still dying. Grow up lad and find yourself a heart.
OrangeD00D (3 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Nuclear power is very viable.

This was 100% human error.
PSNLookBehind (2 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
@OrangeD00D Yea but greenpeace think EVERYTHING can be prevented. They are short sited idealists.
geoduck01 (6 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
i agree, and 1 tonn of urainium has the same amount of enrgy as 25,000 tonns of coal
Teinyhr (1 week ago) Show Hide
 -3
Marked as spam
Greenpeace is so full of shit... Nuclear power plants don't just inherently explode, they are quite possibly some of the safest technology on earth with numerous safeties and fallback systems. Chernobyl, as I've said on many videos, happened due to utterly moronic human error hopefully never repeated again. Wind, solar, and water power simply can't supply the demand as of yet, likely in the future, though. Nuclear power is emission free. Does GP endorse coal plants over nuclear?
zzxzqwq (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
MrThestreetfight you are low IQ idiot. I have already proved France has not got the cheapest energy source plus I have provided sources for this. Your word means nothing.
romrom16 (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Yes France has to change its production way. I'm rench and I'm against nuclear power!!! But I believe hydoelectric power isn't a solution. It destroys envronment and rivers. I think we have to use sun and wind power!!!!
MrThestreetfight (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Why should France change its way when they have the most effecient electricity production and distribution in the world? Because you just hate Nuclear Power? Don't see that happening anytime. zzxzqwq quit making yourself look foolish. Brandon already brutalized you enough haha :)
trainman1995 (1 day ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
many countries deny radiation realleses to the public the days following chrenobyl the radiation had floated over austrian, france borders. while on the austrian side authorities said you shoulnd't buy fresh produce and milk and an france said it was okay for two more weeks. the french are probably lying, many governmants do.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.