Brief Interview with Mike Huckabee over the SPP and NAU

I was pleased to be able to interview former Governor and Republican Presidential candidate Mike Huckabee. He seemed to express a clear opinion against the SPP and NAU, however, he did not seem to evidence a clear understanding of what is happening with the Security and Prosperity Partnership. This is rather surprising, since he was the Governor of Arkansas up until January of 2007 and the SPP was started in March of 2005. However, Congressman Tancredo, a Presidential candidate for the USA has already come out boldly, saying - if elected - "I will kill the North American Union in it's infancy." If you are curious what book I handed him, it is entitled, "Refuting Compromise: A Biblical and Scientific Refutation of 'Progressive Creationism' (Billions of Years) As Popularized by Astronomer Hugh Ross." As a Baptist myself, I don't appreciate Huckabee's compromising position on Creationism, which he espoused in the first NH debate, when pressed if he believes in a literal 6 day creation. His answer was, "I don't know." He went to a theological Baptist seminary and was a pastor and he doesn't know? Further, he espoused the false view, known as theistic evolution, saying that God created a "process." While I respect Huckabee and he may be a good President or Vice President, I think he has made conscious compromises. That's my sincere opinion. (If you are going to take a stand, then go all the way with it.)

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Mike
• Huckabee
• SPP
• NAU
• Congressman
• Tom
• Tancredo

[jmaximo2007]

How is it possible that three educated persons could obliterate a vast amount of scientific evidence that has been proven to be a rational and coherent theory? I can not even fathom voting for someone who is blind to plain facts and reality in order to validate some subjective belief. If a candidate can deny these facts in favor of a misplaced religious conviction, what other facts is that candidate capable of doubting?

[james4tancredo]

You are correct is calling it theory. That's exactly what it is. However, it is not rational and I can hardly call it coherent. It simply defies the 1st and 2nd Laws of Thermodynamics to believe in the THEORY of evolution. Furthermore, pure science is OBSERVABLE and evolution has NEVER been observed.

[james4tancredo]

The point, which you seem to miss, is that Huckabee believes in Theistic Evolution.  He doesn't even believe in Biblical Creationism.

[themaclady]

OH this is ridiculous! When they pretend not to know this means they are fully aware and even complicit...how dumb can they be??????????

[james4tancredo]

This is kind of my point. I am very concerned about that with Huckabee.

[nzalud2]

If you are running for President and you are unaware of the SPP, the NAU, or the TTC, then you should be disqualified.

[classicguitar82]

jmaximo2007, maybe you would like to share at least one scientific fact that proves evolution and or billions of years. I and the evolutionists especially would like to see that so it would move from theory to fact. Good luck with that :)

[classicguitar82]

I didn't know the Hucksters views on creation I'm glad you told me he is actually a liar in that area as well. I already knew he was a fake but he is playing Christian real big and it seems like most are falling for it. He is bought and paid for by the CFR as well. Ron Paul is the only Christian I know of running.

[Ytuber505]

Matthew 7:15

"Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves."

[themaclady]

Tancredo is no better -- he want biochips!