Morality Part2: Morality raped in a new hole

Believe in anything other than the maximization of your own happiness? STOP!

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Morality
• amoralist

[ZullGostnu2]

I look at people with objective morality and objective ethics a greater threat to anarchism than mutual aid or free trade. They want to control what is the absolutes, the path to statism.

[ModelAnarchist]

I agree :)

although, I hate to see such anonymity between us nihilists and the moralists sometimes

[ZullGostnu2]

I've been thinking about this "morality" problem. We have words for good/bad and correct/wrong. Why two different groups of words. Good is not correct. Bad is not wrong. To make these equal is the same as war is peace...Newspeak, the destruction of a language. I pick up a book. If I wanted the book, then this is a correct action. It is not a good action. It is not a bad action. Good and Bad are relativistic description based in morality. Correct and wrong are factual statements.

[ModelAnarchist]

I think I love you :)

I made a list of words that make me think people who use them are retarded, on that list, were words such as: good, bad, evil, should, obligated, natural, ect.

[Nofaris]

What kind of accent do you have?

[ModelAnarchist]

a phony one

[Indigos8rboi]

your welcome :)

[blackacidlizzard]

Are "oughts" moral?

Depends what you mean by moral.

[blackacidlizzard]

It is not true that that if a train is approaching you you ought to move. The only "ifs" that are related to anything that "should" be are those of desire.

You ought to move if you wish to remain alive.

Should is something that can only form within consciousness. All shoulds are created by minds, even if it appears that they are merely "discovered" by said mind. "Should" makes no sense when not tied to a desire.

Should a magnet attract metal? Should rocks float in water?

[ModelAnarchist]

Well I'm pretty sure 100% of amoralists don't believe morality is evil ;-D