MoonFaker: Shifting Stars. PART 1

http://www.moonmovie.com
http://www.billkaysing.com
http://www.ralphrene.com
http://www.moonhoax.us

A follow up to "MoonFaker: Dude, Where's My Star"


Jarrah White would like to invite you to see the Apollo 11 footage that Svector, Phantom Wolf and Shane Killian have tried to suppress from public view.

APOLLO XI: THE LITTLE GEM
http://moonhoax.us/littlegem.htm

See also the evidence of faked and suppressed Apollo 10 footage that Mark Gray doesn't want you to see.

FLAGGING THE GEMS
http://moonhoax.us/flagginggems.htm

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• MoonFaker
• Stars
• Venus
• Apollo
• 14
• 16
• John
• Young
• Alan
• Shepard
• Bill
• Kaysing
• Celestia
• Jarrah
• White
• JW
• Studios

[drtyrell969]

It is just possible that that lame photo of Earth was simply a mock-up? It hardly suggests a detailed authenticity.

[Tweekerhead]

So NASA, at the time of the landings was at the heights of its glory with the American people, yet you're saying they actually took all of these provisions to ensure that anyone, especially post adolescent egocentric narcissist in the future would not be able to detect a so called hoax?

The hell with experiments let's make sure idiots won't think this was a hoax 40 years from now!

At 9:22 ..Big whoop...Shepard moved a few centimeters.

King of the strawman dude!

.

Fail.......Next....

[markshep777]

@LunarTuner or we blindly believe what is on the TV.

[LunarTuner]

Again, another "theory" to explain the "mega-theory". You know, it's so much easier to be a conspiracy theorist. One doesn't have to "know where they got the image from"--or have tangible evidence of anything. To be a CT, one just needs doubt and a theory. From there, any concoction will work nicely. "They could have," "it's possible," etc. How convenient! There's no end to what can be imagined!

[superfatttyfatboy]

What ever happened to Joss Hawthorn & his teescope theories off seeing the moon landing sights from earth? Better to hide?

[TheSremmos]

By the way WhiteJarrah I subscribed to you even though I disagree with your hypothesis. Always remember to research without looking for the answer you want to find otherwise you will become a victim to confirmation bias.

Omission is as much a lie as fabrication, don't forget that.

[GoneToPlaid]

Check out my video response to see where Jarrah made his mistakes while analyzing the Venus photos.

[SirMildredPierce]

@WhiteJarrah It wouldn't matter how far away the two objects are, it only matters what the *angular distance* between the two objects are.

It is an issue within the camera itself, specifically the distance between the lens and the film (or image sensor). Because the film is flat, any light coming in at an angle has further to travel and thus the image gets distorted at the sides.

Why would an object that is far away (not shot with a zoom lens!) not be affected by this phenomena?

[GoneToPlaid]

Jarrah, you had it coming when you posted this video of yours. Thus I have posted a video response which completely debunks your video.

[Boozyscientist]

Within the limits of the specific thing I was investigating, it is an entirely valid comparison.

I've come up with a theory that explains the anomaly and an experiment that supports the theory. It all fits. That is rather unlikely unless I happen to be right.

You cannot take that away unless I screwed up both the theory and the experiment and you can identify exactly how and when.

If you could do that then I would learn something. But you'd have to do it precisely and rigorously.