Creationist Qualifications

It is no secret that most creationists are uneducated in science. Nothing demonstrates this better than this amusing clip.

The young earth creationist in this video is a great example of how uneducated the supporters of creationism/ID are.

When you hear an argument, consider where you heard it from! Yes, I know that if a person is educated, it doesn't necessarily mean they're right. But at least they know what their talking about, unlike most creationist speakers.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• ID
• Intelligent
• Design
• Debate
• Qualification
• Creationist
• Idiot
• Retarded
• Moron
• Uneducated

[thepigofhappiness]

“My name is Malaki King I’ve been speaking on creationism for four years I’ve been studying it for ten years. Makes sense to me; a design demands a designer.”

Why do so many creationists sound like Kent Hovind? where are they from?

[HelixTheThinker]

@thepigofhappiness Funny you should mention that. In fact, many of his slides were literally Kent Hovind slides, and much of his presentation was verbatim from Hovind's seminars on tape. There was even a case where he told an anecdotal about a conversation 'he' had with a professor that was word for word identical from a story Hovind told in a seminar.

[kyekire]

@Mr88platmaker uh genetic code is an algorithm, atheists do have arguments, and even if we didn't it wouldn't matter because there isn't evidence supporting your claim.

[kyekire]

@qvnsq101 1. Qualifications do matter quite a bit. 2 No creationist has any of that.

[qvnsq101]

It doesn't matter what your qualifications are as long as your arguments are sound and rational with no fallacies. However if you are uneducated it is very unlikely that you will have rational arguments in the first place.

[redelman43199]

Creationist Fail

[AmosTheTalented]

Science and education will always crush myths and delution.

[narco73]

Bit of a mis-match don't you think? ha

[desiachar]

@HelixTheThinker

Yea i was thinking the same thing. They all sound like Kent hovind. Same tone of voice too. Bunch of brainwashed pieces of crap.

[ScientificBob]

@Mr88playmaker The process that shapes the genetic "information" is the algoritm, you dumbass. Not the genetics themselves.

The natural phenomena that shapes DNA: evolution. That is what the algoritm is. And if you would have looked up the terms like I asked you, you would have known this. If you would have read my post with your brain turned on instead of off, you would have known this.

You are making yourself look like a dishonest jackass.

[ScientificBob]

@Mr88playmaker Just because I know that you won't look it up:

A genetic algorithm (GA) is a search heuristic that mimics the process of natural evolution. This heuristic is routinely used to generate useful solutions to optimization and search problems. Genetic algorithms belong to the larger class of evolutionary algorithms (EA), which generate solutions to optimization problems using techniques inspired by natural evolution, such as inheritance, mutation, selection, and crossover.

[ScientificBob]

@Mr88playmaker ps: being able to draw analogy proves nothing at all.

Besides, we KNOW how DNA works and forms. We KNOW for a FACT that DNA mutates and accumulates those changes through generations, filtered by a NATURAL selection process. This mechanism is NOT guided by some abstract invisible magic jew. It is a BLIND and NATURAL phenomena.

This very concept is abstracted into "genetic algoritms" LOOK IT UP. My software evolves business processes. BLINDLY and UNGUIDED.