Moral Character & Hypocrisy
Top Comments
All Comments (96)
-
Excellent points. But what's with the fireflies at the end? Lol!
-
another great video!
mitt romney ruined massachusetts though ughhhhh... i have lived in MA all my life...
we needed universal healthcare because he snatched away all the jobs...
-
proteanview guy.I like that you are intelligent and thought.in your commentary...keep reading and being informed and sharing...a good citizen at work!
-
@JusticePetitioner History has proven NOT FOR PROFIT GOV run health care system can & does do a good job, take medicare medicaid for instance. They are widely accepted as good gov programs. Voters help keep system honest. Current FOR PROFIT insurance company controlled health care system clearly isnt working well & is intensly expensive, not to mention a FAR too powerful & controlling lobbying entity. bottom line: If you cant afford to pay pray for obama care
-
@sleekcartim Its NOT good though, that is the point. People who NEED health care cant get it (I am glad you were able to). Care being the key word here, not insurance. You have the Gov paying your medical bills. What about those who dont? What about those who cant afford the insurance THEN get fined for not having it?? Waiting till someone is incapacitated to help them defeats the purpose.
That is MA health care or Obama care.
-
Very likely. I personally am not to excited over this year's nominee selection. I'm not happy with Obama or any of the GOP.
-
@raspberrymuffin Romney is a slick politician. all his flip flopping will come to roost when obama debates him. plus it's hard to cheer for a devout mormon. Mormon cult, er i mean "church" is SERIOUSLY PUSHY / SECRETIVE & CONTROLLING too. You KNOW theres an agenda there! Dont think obama has any serious competition, It's another 4 years of obama for sure IMHO.
-
I meant "weakness" as in when it comes to what Barack could use against Romney in debates. Very likely Obama will say that Romney put in a public health care, and he can use that when they are running against each other, if Romney wins the nomination.
-
I Agree. Politics should be debated by politicians, mathematics should be debated by mathematicians, science should be debated by scientics, weather should be debated by meteorologists, family values should be debated by families.
the problem is that not enough people are debating. people in today's society tend to steer away from conflict and prefer to take it up the ass, whilst bopping to the latest poppy trash.
-
The gingrich & other religious republican hypoctites hate themselves, Their weaknesses / personality defects are unknowingly projected outwardly onto others, for a desperate battle against their own self hate, just like a school yard bully.
I like this Protean guy. He often makes a lot of sense when he talks.
lethalvb01 1 month ago 30
Gingrich and Paul are the only ones that could debate Obama. Romney is a phony plastic person with a soul made of monopoly money and get out of jail free cards. Santorum is a puppy. Ron Paul can out truth them all.Even is they say he's unelectable, I think his foreign policy can pull liberal votes from Obama, and his party will pull repubs, thus slicing both ways and pulling a victory easily. If Ron Paul splits he must call himself independent. Libertarian will alienate too many to win.
tenagliac 1 month ago 3