Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Little Debunker Riddle #02

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,016
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 13, 2009

the debunking of David Chandlers WTC7 collapse time measurement

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (achimspok)

  • Isn't tasty - it's just "watchy".

    watch?v=JjQyXLRpULU

    Btw, how fast should the penthouse be allowed to accelerate? ...according to the NIST claim of a total -near free fall- collapse due to an unsupported column length of 5 floors of one column far below THE BUNKER? (9.8m/ss, 9.79m/ss, 9.78m/ss...???) Ever heard about load distribution?

    You ask WHERE in the collapse does that happen? Oh, you just ask about free fall.

    1) penthouse

    2) outer shell

  • There is another nice math exercise. Take the time of the onset of the penthouse collapse. Calculate the time for the penthouse to fall down to the truss in danger. Take the time of the onset of the collapse of the outer shell. Consider a little moment for outwards and upwards progression and think about the time left for the penthouse to fall slower than free fall through still undamaged floors? NO! Everything below the PH was fallen away before. (NIST claim! Still a red herring?)

  • Time gap EPH - WPH collapse = 6.09 sec

    WTC7 roof height = 174m

    average floor height = 3.7m

    distance roof->truss (7th floor) = 152m

    Free-Fall-Time(152m) = 5.57s

    remaining time for collapse progression (upwards / outwards) = 0.52s

    height = 0.5*g*t²

    SLOWEST POSSIBLE acceleration (without any progression or delay) = 8.2 m/s²

    Of course all floors below the penthouse must have fallen and we really don't know which floor actually crushed the transfer trusses BUT you may trust your own eyes.

  • I really wonder! If the first or 2nd or 3rd falling floor didn't crush the transfer trusses then a growing pile should have sheltered the truss.

    Btw, I don't believe column 79 was the first one because the south wall of the penthouse was supported by columns 80 and 81. While the north wall started to fall there was no south wall anymore.

see all

All Comments (9)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Yes. The whole "penthouse" crapfest is a ridiculous canard that a lot of idiots embarrassed themselves with and some still continue to embarrass themselves with it. That's why we're laughing at them, not with them. Luckily, they do most of our work for us because people read their crapfestola and realize that they are idiots and "we" are correct. Even NIST now agrees that we are correct. How cool and great and wonderful is that? LOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!! *snark*

  • This refers to NIST's calculation of the collapse time of the building (which started with the dropping of the penthouse).

    But I think they eventually admitted free-fall didn't they?

  • The acceleration of the men is, zero, zip, nada,' just like the West penthouse after it collapsed. What was left of it after being exploded fell at the same acceleration as the whole buioing, which was near freefall....

    Any more questions?

  • lulz, stop bitching, idiot

  • This is the stupidest nonsensical thing I've ever seen. What idiot did this and thinks it means anything?

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more