Little Debunker Riddle #02
Uploader Comments (achimspok)
All Comments (9)
-
Yes. The whole "penthouse" crapfest is a ridiculous canard that a lot of idiots embarrassed themselves with and some still continue to embarrass themselves with it. That's why we're laughing at them, not with them. Luckily, they do most of our work for us because people read their crapfestola and realize that they are idiots and "we" are correct. Even NIST now agrees that we are correct. How cool and great and wonderful is that? LOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!! *snark*
-
This refers to NIST's calculation of the collapse time of the building (which started with the dropping of the penthouse).
But I think they eventually admitted free-fall didn't they?
-
The acceleration of the men is, zero, zip, nada,' just like the West penthouse after it collapsed. What was left of it after being exploded fell at the same acceleration as the whole buioing, which was near freefall....
Any more questions?
-
lulz, stop bitching, idiot
-
This is the stupidest nonsensical thing I've ever seen. What idiot did this and thinks it means anything?
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Hahaha, this is cute!
We could add, 'does controlled demolition result in freefall, and if so, WHERE in the collapse does that happen?'
Make this Riddle number 1 for twoofers.
ps. Where did you get the 'freefall' calculation for the penthouse? Or is it not necessary to justify that claim?
Tasty little red herring, isn't it? I'll post this video just for the sport of it, not that this video makes any sense. What the hell.
alienentity 2 years ago
Isn't tasty - it's just "watchy".
watch?v=JjQyXLRpULU
Btw, how fast should the penthouse be allowed to accelerate? ...according to the NIST claim of a total -near free fall- collapse due to an unsupported column length of 5 floors of one column far below THE BUNKER? (9.8m/ss, 9.79m/ss, 9.78m/ss...???) Ever heard about load distribution?
You ask WHERE in the collapse does that happen? Oh, you just ask about free fall.
1) penthouse
2) outer shell
achimspok 2 years ago
There is another nice math exercise. Take the time of the onset of the penthouse collapse. Calculate the time for the penthouse to fall down to the truss in danger. Take the time of the onset of the collapse of the outer shell. Consider a little moment for outwards and upwards progression and think about the time left for the penthouse to fall slower than free fall through still undamaged floors? NO! Everything below the PH was fallen away before. (NIST claim! Still a red herring?)
achimspok 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Please show us all your calculations to back up your claim.
We'll critique them at that time.
thanks in advance. You weren't expecting us to do that work for you I hope - It's your claim, you gotta prove it buddy.
I'll check your measurements and math, don't worry - when I see them.
alienentity 2 years ago
Time gap EPH - WPH collapse = 6.09 sec
WTC7 roof height = 174m
average floor height = 3.7m
distance roof->truss (7th floor) = 152m
Free-Fall-Time(152m) = 5.57s
remaining time for collapse progression (upwards / outwards) = 0.52s
height = 0.5*g*t²
SLOWEST POSSIBLE acceleration (without any progression or delay) = 8.2 m/s²
Of course all floors below the penthouse must have fallen and we really don't know which floor actually crushed the transfer trusses BUT you may trust your own eyes.
achimspok 2 years ago
I really wonder! If the first or 2nd or 3rd falling floor didn't crush the transfer trusses then a growing pile should have sheltered the truss.
Btw, I don't believe column 79 was the first one because the south wall of the penthouse was supported by columns 80 and 81. While the north wall started to fall there was no south wall anymore.
achimspok 2 years ago