TNA Main-Eventers: We Are The Old
Top Comments
All Comments (104)
-
go to hell f you
-
what did aj say to you
-
@brocklock09 It's not a weak argument. If you're talking about old, then isn't anything past the age of 40 in prowrestling "old"? It's not about whose older or whose more in shape. Their still old, past their prime, past their hayday, and taking up tv time. Both companies present wrestlers from years ago as legitimate selling points n main eventers to a certain extent. So I don't see how any1 can try and single out TNA when WWE does the same things and never gets called out on it
-
@RetardMcspakypants Nash wrestles house shows and big tour dates as well. He's also been on tv every week for the most part since he came back. Kane will be on TV every week, So will Big Show, So will Y2J, etc. There's more active veterans and veteran faces on the WWE roster than it is in TNA but somehow fans want to overlook that and call TNA: the home of the old just because they had a few vets for the past few years and have 2 big time legends on the roster atm.
-
@RetardMcspakypants Being on TV all the time n being an active wrestler are 2 diff things.U r still playing the double standard. Hogan & Flair in TNA r mostly characters on the show not wrestlers. You want to excuse Undertaker for wrestling once a year but Hogan has only had 2 matches in his 2 years in the company. Flair only wrestles a handful of times. So I don't see how u or anyone can try to single out TNA. If he's gonna make a TNA vid, he should make a WWE one too.
-
@kob456 Fair enough but guys like Taker and HHH aren't on TV all the time like Hogan and Sting were. Really I don't mind "old" guys wrestling as long as they can deliver, and most of who WWE uses can still go on the big PPVs like Booker. Hogan CAN NOT GO ANYMORE, Sting can but NOT with Hogan.
-
@kob456 Holy shit dude NONE of the guys you just mentioned except for Henry are full time. Don't know why you think Nash is full time either. Show and Kane are working part-time now although they work for several months before taking breaks, HHH is on TV now but really he only wrestles at big shows, if Jericho comes back it's only for a short period (how do you consider Jericho old anyway?) and Taker is down to wrestling ONCE A YEAR.
-
@kob456 Hogan/Sting was THE selling point for BFG, judging by the Impact right after. And I'm not gonna argue the other three, because you're right. But comparing Shawn Michaels to Sting, when HBK is a fair deal younger? Taker to Hogan, who by all rights was in the Taker position roughly a decade ago....it just doesn't work that well. Not saying your wrong, just that the argument is weak.
-
@RetardMcspakypants Nash is full time, Booker T maybe part time but who knows how long that will last. But for now, you have Henry, Big Show, Kane, HHH, a soon returning Chris Jericho, and a soon returning Undertaker. That's 8 people in all
-
@brocklock09 Hogan/Sting was a selling point for BFG. And if u want to call them the main event for that, then the same can be said for WWE's since matches like Undertaker/HHH, Undertaker/HBK, Flair/HBK have all been the center of attention of WrestleMania for the past few WrestleManias.
Hell I'm a big TNA Fan and I even found this funny lmaoooo:)
DMac9296 4 months ago 28
@Mostpowerisgod married with children,,,old tv show from the 80s through to the 90s
killacut10 4 months ago 20