BFRO Thermal Video Cropped

It is hard to see the subject in the thermal imaging video, so this is a zoomed in version so the subject can be seen more clearly. Especially enlightening viewed full screen.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• bigfoot
• sasquatch
• thermal
• imaging
• of

[norseman7088]

They only proof that is going to settle the question is a body or body part.

We have videos, we have pictures, we have foot casts, we have a body cast, we have hand casts, we have hair samples.....it doesn't convince science.

[tontar]

@norseman7088 No hair samples have produced viable DNA, or stand as proof. Conversely, there have been plenty of hairs allegedly collected at sightings that have turned out to be synthetic. "Authentic" collections turning out to be synthetic hair? Think about it. Casts are casts, impressions that can be made by a real animal or by a human faking them. The only video that looks halfway credible is the PGF film. Nothing else comes close to looking real.

[tontar]

@tontar Additionally, the body cast is likely a hoax. How does a "thing" lay down in mud, get up, and leave no hand or foot prints? There were prints from elk and the researches all around, and in the body cast, yet no bigfoot hand or foot prints anywhere, not a single one. Explain why a biped would see food, then lay down to roll through mud to get at it, then roll out, all the while leaving no knee, no elbow, no hand or foot prints. Thinking it is a bigfoot body defies logic.

[norseman7088]

@tontar That's why we need a body, or a part there of.

[tontar]

@norseman7088 Agreed. :-) Question is, at some point in time we will have to come to some conclusions if one doesn't show up. While I try to stay optimistic that something will materialize, the fact is that it has been well over 40 years since the PGF was made, and nothing has turned up significant since. Not anything conclusive anyway. The woods are shrinking, they are well explored and visited by hunters, hikers, sportsmen, and no physical remains. At some point, conclusions have to be made.

[tontar]

@norseman7088 ...such as, were they real? Did they go extinct? If real, where did they go? Some remains would undoubtedly be left somewhere. Heck, we have remains of mammoths still showing up. Ice men, extinct indians. All remains do not melt down and disappear in the forests, in spite of what people might say. At some point, if they do or did exist, something would turn up. Something more than prints and fuzzy photos. If nothing ever shows up, then what? What will people believe in 20 years?

[marcjtdc]

@crazycatlady68 I know. They are self proclaimed authorities. In the tv series finding bigfoot, they proved this was easily faked, but vocally gave mike credit at the end for the best footage since patterson. fuck you bfro and miked green, fucking snake oil salesman.

[crazycatlady68]

@marcjtdc BFROs founders last name is Moneymaker is it not? Nuff said. Also on the tv show a grown man is called..Bobo..how r we to take that seriously?

[DumDDumDum]

tontar

The film is a composite. The dark image near the center is a horse or mule. Watch carefully in slow motion or frame by frame and see an illuminated person cross behind the horse as the guy goes to the right.. He shows through the head and neck of the horse. Watch the background carefully for movement and you'll find people. I don't trust anything that says BFRO.

[norseman7088]

@tontar What I have found Tontar is that the people that are out there searching for it? Are very much against shooting one. They are relying on better trace evidence to prove it's existence. (pictures, foot casts, etc) It's pure folly......science has spoken and they need a type specimen.

[Comickid1000]

much too fuzzy to determine if the video is a hoax or not. I believe in sasquatch, but this looks like a mutated black bear taking a piss in a Denny's resturant. Way too fuzzy.