Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Climate Change and Global Dimming

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
1,859
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 8, 2009

Jim Haywood, climate expert at the Met Office Hadley Centre, explains the phenomenon of global dimming and the impacts on global warming.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (25)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • watch this video

    Climate Change Facts vs Fiction

  • yea stop these crazy scientists from polluting...stop geoengineering the mess, so that you can turn around and say that geoengineering is actually the solution to our problems...with your backward ways of doing things...creating a crisis to keep yourselves busily employed solving them...how can you sleep soundly at night?

  • @SuperLuigirules1 I have told you that the forests-lungs is a public misconception and explained why. There is no need to ask a scientist if you understand the metamorphosis the carbon experiences in the forest. Yet, the disputed question, "Which rainforest produces half of the world's oxygen?", was asked from a reputed scientist on WikiAnswers. It is worth for poor people who lack education and believe Google.

  • @valtih1978 Your the idiot as it's a known fact that 20% of the worlds oxygen comes from the Amazon a "Rainforest" Tree's filter the air and remove Carbon it's a proven fact you were obviously never taught this at school. For the love of god visit a natural history museum! I understand that dead plants rot down over millions of years to form oil, gas.. the basic forms of carbon energy. We are all carbon based but whilst they are alive they clean our air. Google it, Call up a scientist.

  • @SuperLuigirules1 I have explained you two times that forests produce no O2. How can I explain something that does not exist? Are you an idiot? Obviously, you just monkey the term after without understanding what is the second half of forest carbon cycle.

    > rabbles on like a politician

    The dominating ideology determines the economy. It seems too early for you indeed.

  • Tree's teraformed this planet into an inhabitable place over millions of years. During the process the tree uses the Carbon to make Sugar (or food) which it survives on and has no use for the 02 so releases it into the air, Think of it as a giant filter such as found in a fish tank which filters out the carbon using and leaves 02. All life on earth is carbon based so when it dies it will release carbon in it's basic form. Nasa are looking at teraforming other planets to make them habitable.

  • @valtih1978 But again your disputing known sceince that trees Convert CO2 into 02. In that case please explain how the Amazon Produces 20% of the worlds CO2. I think it is you who are the ignorant one and rabbles on like a politician instead of making a clear point.

  • @SuperLuigirules1 I use word 'ignorance' because you demonstrate it in every post. By disregarding the context, you give my phrases absolutely different meaning and prove what you like. The life on the Planet is pretty serious thing for kidding.

    Since the net oxygen production is 0, trees clean air by preventing soil erosion and absorbing dust and dangerous gases in cities (not CO2). But the main reason not to cut forest is capitalist consumption-based growth. The planet will not survive it.

  • @valtih1978 I was simply disproving your claim that Tree's don't convert Co2 in 02. You really love to use the term Ignorance when your the one who doesn't belive that the Amazon or Boral Forests clean the air we breath, At no point have a I said this is the only part of the Carbon Cycle on earth, But it is one of the single biggest factors. We are never going to agree on this matter clearly. So I'm going to agree to disagree with you.

  • @SuperLuigirules1 I have pointed out that the photosynthesis is only one half of the Carbon cycle. By ignoring the other, CnHm + O2 -> CO2 + H2O, you try to prove that the whole balance is not zero or oxygen is produced. What if I follow your reason to claim that trees consume O2 rather than produce it and emit CO2? Hardly, your ignorance is a good basis for reassuring those who see the whole picture of the Nature.

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more